Letter I am sending out tomorrow: Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent; Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal 7-7-2014 *The Commercial Lien Process* A Common Law Commercial Lien is a process that any Human Being can employ in order to obtain lawful remedy from the actions of another Human Being(s) who have – or have attempted to – or have conspired to - damage said Human in some way. Such wrongs are known as “torts”, and are the subject of Tort Law. This includes ‘harassment’, such as ‘threats with menaces’, which is considered to be ‘psychological damage’, and also ‘defamation of character’, which is also considered to ‘damage a reputation’. The reason for this is very simple: Since all are equal under the LAW, then each Human Being has a Duty of Care to each other Human Being, such as to make sure that – whatever action we take towards each other – we have the Common Law behind those actions, and thus can live together in peace. Abrogating said Duty of Care is a CRIMINAL ACT, and constitutes a tort. I believe that you have created a tort, or torts, against My Human Self. The Commercial Lien process is a construct of the Common Law (The Law-of-the-Land), and America is a Common Law jurisdiction (being, as it is, on Land). Thus any Human Being residing in this country is subject to the Common Law above all else. And that includes the individual(s), to whom this Notice is addressed. The process comprises: 1. The subject of the harassment (myself in this case), will wrote a Statement of Truth (Affidavit), under penalty of perjury. This being the case, what I wrote will be “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth”, and will thus be based on first-hand knowledge. 2. You were sent a copy of this Affidavit, comprising my allegations. You had opportunity to REBUT EACH POINT in order to ward off the possibility of a Lien. You were given 30 (thirty) days to do so, but you did not rebut EVEN ONE SINGLE POINT. You were given time to rebut by means of a sworn Affidavit of your own, written under the same criteria, namely: From first-hand knowledge, and under penalty of perjury. 3. Any points you manage to rebut would be removed from my allegations, and the remainder kept as my final Affidavit. The result will be Notarised (by a Notary Public) to which will not only become THE TRUTH, IN LAW – but will also become A JUDGMENT, IN LAW. 4. That being the case, no Hearing will be required. Because the judgement has already been made by the truth. (That’s Common Law!) 5. I will then place a Public Advertisement, warning whomsoever may be concerned, that your creditworthiness is henceforth highly suspect. I will inform Credit Reference Agencies to this effect. I would then be LAWFULLY ENTITLED TO SIEZE ANY OF YOUR PROPERTY, up to (and including) the value of the Lien. 6. This process will occur in a LAWFUL manner – because you were given the chance to REBUT IN SUBSTANCE - and I will thus retain entirely ‘clean hands’ (unlike yourselves, which is why your mechanism is UNLAWFUL, and why I am able to counter it by this LAWFUL means). 7. As footnotes, I should add that a. Even if I make an honest mistake, WHICH YOU FAILED TO REBUT, my mistake BECOMES THE TRUTH, IN LAW. You will not be able to claim ‘libel’, ‘slander’, etc, because you were given thirty days to rebut the allegations, before public announcement. b. By a failure to REBUT IN SUBSTANCE you have tacitly acquiesced to my Statements as Truths, in Law. c. REBUT IN SUBSTANCE does not comprise simply dismissing my allegations. That is mere gainsaying. “IN SUBSTANCE” means “accompanying with HARD proofs” (in this case, “to the contrary”). 1. As a part of the Lien, I will demand a substantial sum in recompense/settlement of the damages. 2. Being Common Law construct, the only way this Lien can be removed is: a. By Full Payment … in which case I will remove it b. The passage of 99 years c. The verdict of a Jury of 12, deciding that the Lien should not have been imposed. But this will require YOU to take ME to a Court de Jure (Common Law Court) … whereupon I will be able to explain (to said Jury) exactly how you took actions which comprised the tort(s) against me WITHOUT ANY LAWFUL EXCUSE WHATSOEVER. DO NOT, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, ASSUME THAT ANY JUDGE CAN REMOVE A LIEN. A JUDGE CONNOT DO THAT, AND JUDGES KNOW THAT (because it is a Common Law, NOT A STATUTORY, process) That being the case, I suggest that you take full Notice of this Notice, and immediately cease & desist from your UNLAWFUL actions in respect of My Self. You will find, in the future, that you will need to contend with this Commercial Lien process more frequently as time goes on, and more people discover it. Now might be a very good time to find yourself a decent, honest, upright, honourable job – instead of the thoroughly despicable, dishonest, and downright FRAUDULENT one you currently get away with. If you wanted an obligation from me, you should have requested it – before doing ANYTHING else. It’s far too late now. To carry on, under the gross mis-assumption that you have such an obligation, is simply CRIMINAL. And, if you persist, you will eventually pay very dearly. Filing your “notices of invalid liens” was just another illegal act & carry zero legal authority. The liens are very legal & valid & proof of many constitutional & civil rights violations against me & must be settled soon without further illegal actions! I never at any time broke any laws or did anything illegal as was proven in my Statement of Truth. Every day without a settlement is another day of violating my rights! Sincerely, without ill-will, frivolity or vexation, Trapper Killsmany: of the Killsmany family, as commonly called, American Sovereign, and subject SOLEY to The Common Law. Without any admission of any liability whatsoever, and with all Natural Indefeasible Rights reserved.
Posted on: Sun, 06 Jul 2014 14:32:59 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015