Letters: Date: Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:57 AM Subject: Re: Fwd: Fwd: Radio Frequency Water Meters. To: Cc: [email protected] Thank you for this. The City has thought about an option that would give people comfort with their concerns of RF and as one of the water meter install options, a touch pad system can be installed on the side of the residents building. This touch pad has a hard wired communication cable running from it to the meter that eliminates the need for RF. The meter readers will than read the meter by physically touching the outside pad with their data collector. This is an option free of charge to the residents of Grand Forks during the installation phase in 2015. If you would be interested in this option, just let myself or the City Hall know and we can make this happen. Attention: Mayor and Council Further to my email from Youtube re RF water meters (https://youtube/watch?v=INDEHZzX-Rw ). I am forwarding an email from Hans Karow (not provided) who I have been in contact with (among others) since last late summer. Hans is one of many individuals who suffers from a strong sensitivity to electromagnetic waves and his testing of these RF meters with an acoustimeter shows, as does the Youtube article that the RF emissions show a strong spike and even more so using the cornet which is more sensitive. I would be subject to these waves every 14 secs 24 hrs a day at a close proximity in my 10 by 40 ft trailer. I have contacted Health Canada, Medtronic (who manufacture my pacemaker) and Neptune Technologies. All quote the Quebec Hydro tests that indicate that the emissions are not harmful unless within 6 of one. When I tried to get the written definitive test I was told that the tester was no longer at their original address and, stranger still, no copies of the report were available! I do not want to be the guinea pig in this. I would like other avenues to be explored. It would seem to me that in this day and age we should be able to get a meter that emits only when read. I would be willing to pay the difference if any. Or shield the meter so that my trailer is free from emissions and that they are funneled so that they could be read from the lane or street. Or an analog meter that could be easily read. The City of Calgary homeowners read their meters and phone in the results monthly with the city checking every 6 months or so. I do not want to be subjected to these waves that may obstruct my pacemaker in insuring that it regulates the proper beating of my heart and Im sure you dont either. Sent: January 20, 2015 12:16 AM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Frank Clegg; Atamanenko; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Wayne Baldwin Subject: Many thanks for Bill C 648 Dear Mr. Young, I am writing a brief yet sincere and enthusiastic note to convey my thanks for your stance in parliament re cell phone labelling. Also to the members from all parties who have supported you so far. Bill C 648, if it passes, will make a huge difference to the welfare and awareness of Canadians and others beyond our borders. It is an important step. Also, I thank you for the articulate and clear way you presented the facts at your press conference alongside C4ST. c4st.org/PMB We need more people in our government who will do their due diligence, see beyond the status quo and speak for what is right. You have done all three of these! Please continue to pursue this line of thinking and action. You have the support of countless people who have woken up to this issue, and will have more as time passes. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you! Sent: January 20, 2015 11:52 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Bill C-648 Dear Mr. Hiebert, Last December, Conservative MP, Oakville’s Terence Young, tabled a private members bill, Bill C-648, or the Warning Labels for Radio Apparatus Act, that would require manufacturers to put warning labels on the outside packaging of cellphones and other electronic devices. As a constituent in your riding, I ask you to support this bill. The issue of harm from radio frequency technology has long been a concern to me. I know that you will be the recipient of lobbying tactics from the telecommunications and technology industries on this bill. I understand that the harm potential of our wireless telecommunications devices can be reduced, but industry is dragging their feet on implementing such measures, due to related cost. How can the health of our citizens come in second to the profits of industry?? While Health Canada refuses to update Safety Code 6 to align it with international standards to protect our citizens, we must take the precautionary principle into our own hands and give the users of technology warning to protect themselves. I enclose a couple of links to further educate you about the newest information about the harms that are related to our current wireless telecommunications devices: This first link is to a video of a few minutes length in which an individual , who speaks from personal experience, addresses his plea for attention to the issue to his local government. Very powerful. He developed cancer in 3 sites of his body...where he used and and carried his cell phone. This gentleman demonstrates the risk is very real. citizensforsafetechnology.org/Jimmy-Gonzalez-Cell-Phones-Cause-Cancer,5,4098 And this link takes you to a 20 minute video of a talk by Dr. Leif Salford, neurosurgeon and researcher about Electromagnetic Fields and Leakage of the Blood Brain Barrier ( and what that contributes to). Graphic and powerful information. https://youtube/watch?v=E_WJ_aJPWIA Very clearly the precautionary principle should be inherent in our use of wireless technology. I strongly urge you to support Bill C-648. Sincerely, Sent: January 20, 2015 10:30 AM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Bill C-648 re. health warning labeling on wireless devices To the Honorable John Duncan, Dear John, As a member of your constituency, I am respectfully asking you for your support of Bill C-648 which was introduced yesterday by MP Terrence Young. During my efforts to prevent a cell tower to be constructed in Willow Point park right next to playgrounds in 2013, I did a large amount of research about the effects of wireless technology, electromagnetic fields, and microwave radiation. To this day, I keep following new studies. What deeply concerns me is, that the Wireless Industry influences publications to report in their favour and downplay warnings coming from honest, independent and highly regarded doctors and scientists. Your position gives you the opportunity to stand up against the Industrys disregard for public safety by supporting Bill C-648. Wireless Technology is here to stay. What every user needs to learn, is how to apply it safer, how to reduce exposure levels, and how to keep children protected. The public needs to hear much more about this issue, uncensored true information, not edited by powerful profit oriented manufacturers. Let’s not have happen, what happened in San Francisco, where the city, after passing a similar bill, was blackmailed by the Wireless Industry such that the bill was withdrawn. There is much information from trusted sources available, and if you require, I would be please to provide you with links. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Posted on: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 19:13:17 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015