Living in Russia , Volgograd region, Volgograd user bubnov.vas @ yandex.ru democrator.ru/problem/6594 89375532924 general information open pismaZaregistrirovana March 14, 2013 Gender Woman blog post 0 Comments 0 During that eight -odd years? LG Lartseva ; 27.2.2012 • 06:39 RF Dear President , I am writing to you. Son was taken from the apartment without presentation dokumentov.Synu falsified obvinenie.Protokoly compiled interrogation without a lawyer and pedagoga.Sledovatel falsified testimony son , son signed disagree. , Not subsequently consent izchezli.S son not conducted investigations , no confrontations bylo.Na interrogations of 14 November 2006 , the legal representative is not invited , there is a document at this time was on rabote.Mera preventive detention of falsified , backdating . (20 October 2006 on the legal representative was work, there dokumenty.Na son Lartsev court stated that the crime was not imeit otnoschenie , the court ignored , court records izmeneny.Verhovny Fs court does not consider meet the legal representative in the case nikto.Sledovatel not issued regulations in part to protect her son , and extended the powers already in a different capacity , as the son came of age in the tumor SIZO.U son , curved spine, there is a photo ignoriruyut.S criminal case is not acquainted , reprinted all business in September 2010, all protocols g.Vo falsified podpisi.Ne consent son interrogations otsustvuyut.Osnovnye participants witnessed the crime and svobode.Syn sits at just tak.Nas everywhere blokiruyut.Syn was несовершеннолетним.Кассационная complaint son was changed with declarations that the son did not, on the basis of these confessions , the Supreme Court R. F. dismissed the son unchanged, wrote about this change complaints protest , the protest has disappeared and is not considered , the lawyer these and other circumstances hid . sentence appeal can not , from the prison to the Supreme Court documents do not reach RF , lawyers are not taken in this case , since it may suffer from slozhivshiisya advokat.Proshu understand the situation , otherwise , it is impossible in a civilized way , we ignoriruyut.My so confident that on this site have long been locked out and vote like prodolzhaetsya.Mnogo times it has been shown that this page does not exist and shows errors , we applied on this occasion to the site , the answer was , but adhere to the position that we have long zabanili.Tem more for unsubscribing referenced leaders clearly reflects that it is not legitimate condemnation knew ivse our appeals blocked at professional level , without kompitetnosti not do it vozmozhno.Proverka write detained him , in fact he was forcibly taken away from kvartiry.Prestuplenie on which no legally condemned , it does not have the right to abduct and there was pressure , forced to sign the protocols without legal predstavitelya.Mozhem add appeal before the local courts does not make sense , this is a long time, the court did not find violations , corruption existents , so it came steel broke into houses , but checks refuse entry into private property, and other violations , they all zakonno.U vidio us stood in the peephole . vas-mublog.blogspot/ Eight years after that More than eight years for that . Supreme Court of the RF, RF General Prosecutor Investigative Committee of the Prosecutor of RF European Court of Human Rights, , not the law of convicted Lartseva Eugene O. 1988g.r . Volgograd Regional Court under Article 20.08.2007g 105 ch2.p and g of the Criminal Code and sentencing to 8 years 3 months in the colony with a general regime COMPLAINT . 18.10.06 . I did not lawfully detained , without presentation of any documents in the crime I did not participate , the actions of investigators and a lawyer is not legal. Indications witness Sukhovoj V.N.ne correspond with data Forensic medical examination. Witness Suhova V.N.ne once stole my family cell phones, took part in the arson had close relations with the party to the crime Egorov AA, this fact proves to be true the criminal case number 1 , as well as a close relationship with the witness Volik Ya The minutes of questioning the obvious fact of falsification of protocols of interrogation , I totally refuse of crime , not guilt admit falsifying reports of interrogation of 18.10.06 . , 26.10.06 . , 14.11.06 , readings on the days I did not give 14.11.06,26.10 .06 . questioning was not carried out at all, lawyer otsustvovala all interrogations , and during presentation indictment zaklyucheniya.23.04.07.g.18.10.06 , 26.10.06g , I had the made records not soglasii.Kassatsionnuyu complaint I made on 25 sheets did not acknowledge guilt , sheets change .. 14.11.06 voobsche.26.10.06g examination was not carried out . was not at the same time of court hearings and questioning protocol was drawn up in advance by the investigator Mudzhikova HN , confrontations not been with me , the evidence is not predyavili.Advokat appointed investigator Barsykovym AL illegally consultation with me provodila.Suhova VN appointed witness is not legal , it is a direct participant in the crime , its action is not izschuchalis , I was deprived of the right to defense , the legal representative is not allowed to Corollary 8 months , until the end sledstviya.Vse not legal and not justified. (copy available) Lartsev EO signature Lartsev.Vsya problem is that there is no possibility to appeal the verdict , according to many prepyatstviy.Ya proceedings nobody , but there attorney on behalf syna.Pisma not reach, no one knows who is responsible and not suschestvu.Vo second with a criminal case is not introduced , and to verify that specified in the volume , but it is not and there is evidence on the actions for which the answers were not tons of seals, and are not expelled , it does not meet the procedural part of the entire criminal dela.I turns out we all pishim zhalaby undocumented that prosecutors must provide and Suski , but this net.Sazhayut people who checks that accused and condemned , can not appeal , since verification is not specified violations and violations we can corroborate , but they are not considered as all violations must confirms local prosecutors office , or documents , but this is nothing and no, and no matter if suda.Pomimo still we made advances on the case will probably parallel sozdovat another criminal case against us, not us and not someone write a zhalovatsya.Vot vicious circle ! . So you need to write to the court Knstitutsionny Fs and independently take back all the criminal case and the fact that we pootvechali as defunct link to order on chuzhii sentences are sent to the Supreme Court and other dokazatelstva.Analog Fs is written 6828,6706,6769,6594 documents . all social networks are blocking us , not recording prosmatrivayutsya.S Federal level not suschestvu.Zhaloby answers from her son did not come with documents , only complaints that do not play in the appeal roli.Fakticheski son left without protection and no defense during the investigation and was sudah.Davlenie , but referred the son admitted that the pressure was not , we have a document , it is described that the investigators were doing during sledstviya.Advokata and teacher for the entire period of investigation is not was , there are many documents that can show in court. Lartseva Larissa GeorgievnaVolgograd 400,082.50 years 17-413 Lartseva October 8442 62 -97- 84.Syn be Uryupinsk , tuberculosis hospital . 27.02.2012 10:51 Blog posts open letters groups community councils community members Internet - reception President of the Russian Federation Commissioner for Human Rights FSIN of Russia General Prosecutors Office Russian Ministry of Internal Affair
Posted on: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 16:06:18 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015