Lukaas Van Hout with Morne Rh Final Posting and please view the final notes. I have been instructed by our Father to change my avatar to a foto of Jan van Riebeeck and to also post the picture of Jan van Riebeeck for the next 7 days having begun on the Sabbath, 10 January, to the next Sabbath, 17 January . His will be done! (THIS is day 7) Notes; Commanded by ELohiym to change my profile picture to this one of Jan van Riebeeck. We all know some of the reasons. ELohiym will not be mocked by a false exorcist of the satan attempting to smear the name of this man who represented the promises of ELohiym made to the children of Israel of the tribe of Zebulon from the Netherlands. This new profile picture is part of his answer to this house of Pharaoh in South Africa regarding the House of Israel and their legitimate claim as set forth in scriptures in the promises made to Abraham and Jacob. Another thought just occurred to me about the change of the profile picture. Interesting how his command to change the profile picture came after that false exorcist and those words written to Pharaoh as if to emphasis the falseness of Zumas exorcist and the divine confirmation of Jan van Riebeeck. I am certain that as time progresses much more is to come from what appears to be just a simple change in a profile picture. Once again, ELohiym has a plan. Additional Notes Others have been doing the same as they are led. Another note, my oh my does ELohiym have a plan, the name of Jan van Riebeeck and all that he represented is becoming know throughout the world! Interesting watching all that has happened since that instruction to post the foto of Jan van Riebeeck and as the days have passed by we have seen and understood more and more as to just why this happened. ELohiym has plan and what seemed odd that first day when the foto was posted sure makes sense now and in more ways than we imagined! So part of the lesson in this is to do whatever he instructs us to do in faith, trust and obedience knowing that our Father will never ask us to do anything contrary to his word, living, written or spoken! So when we do as asked, his plans and purposes become apparent at some point and always far more than what we may have thought or expected. From a recent news story; But, as it turns out, the portrait, a symbol of national pride during the apartheid era, is not of Jan van Riebeeck, but most likely of a Dutch local who never even set foot in the country. Interesting where this journey leads! Nonetheless, ELohiym has a plan so the picture that we have become accustomed to as being of Jan van Riebeeck will remain and this post will be added to the next post tomorrow when the picture is posted again. Final Notes; From iol online Van Riebeeck makes a comeback Excerpt; Jan – whose idealised image was on our banknotes, coins and stamps for decades – was positioned as a father of the white nation. Deeply mired in apartheid’s vicious propaganda, who were we, as children, to ask questions? After all, April 6, the day Jan landed, was a public holiday throughout our childhoods. President Jacob Zuma himself, an elder of a generation or two hence, must have learnt about Jan and his prodigious appetites. But then, there was light. At last, 340 years later, we were given the chance to grasp at the truth and discover it wasn’t a crime or a sin to reject Van Riebeeck for what he was. With that knowledge, and the excitement of a new nation, most of us easily left him behind. Then came last week, and the occasion of the ANC’s 103rd birthday. Jovial, defiant in DA territory as the party celebrated its January 8 Statement, Zuma decided to draw up on that sandy beach again, saying Van Riebeeck’s arrival was the beginning of “all the trouble… the numerous struggles, wars and deaths… the grabbing of land and the denial of indigenous people’s political and economic power”. You might have agreed. But if you thought most would at least have brushed it off as a typically ad hoc Zuma remark, in keeping with the ANC’s theme of the divided city, you would be wrong. Instead, Van Riebeeck again loomed in the national consciousness this week as the Freedom Front Plus (FF+) laid a charge of hate speech against Zuma with the South African Human Rights Commission (HRC), and everybody started weighing in. Emotional FF+ MP advocate Anton Alberts described the comments as “polarising on a racial basis”, “grossly insulting” and “unpresidential”. ANC spokesman Zizi Kodwa angrily retorted that Alberts would be better placed to complain about history. A couple of days into the storm, having filed the party’s papers at the HRC, Alberts was more composed. “Obviously, the utterances made by the president regarding white people as a whole, places a collective guilt upon them that they are the ones responsible for all problems in South Africa, and obviously, we know that is not historically correct. “We have a problem with these utterances because, when you are elected president, no matter whether everybody voted for you or not, you are responsible for everyone – regardless. “In terms of human rights and constitutional issues, he has made himself guilty of hate speech in that he’s made a group of South Africans a scapegoat for everything that has gone wrong. “But while many of us know that’s not true, he’s created an environment where radical people, who do not think rationally, can decide to take action. So it would seem the exorcism has had the reverse effect and the memory of Jan van Riebeek has been re-established and these insults have led to more scrutiny against the ANC and others. iol.co.za/the-star/van-riebeeck-makes-a-comeback-1.1805615#.VLmoI0fF98E
Posted on: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 06:39:32 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015