MH17.. THE DUTCH NOW ATTEMPT A GLOBALIST COVERUP? OH GOLLY.. IT WAS STRUCK BY MULTIPLE HIGH ENERGY OBJECTS...DUH WHY NOT MENTION THE SU 25S .50 CAL GUNSHOTS? OH GEE THOSE PIERCINGS CAUSED THE UN-PENETRATED BATTERY POWERED BLACK BOX NOT TO WORK?...PFFT..NO WONDER THE MALAYSIANS WERE PISSED..OH AND TRY TO INSTILL THAT THE IN FLIGHT RADAR SHOWED 3 COMMERCIAL AIRCRAFT....MORE BS...SU 25S ARE NOT COMMERCIAL..TRY TO ALSO IMPLY IT BROKE UP IN MID AIR..AND THE WRECKAGE CLEAR SHOWS NOT...DUH LET THE GERMANS THAT TOLD THE TRUTH SPEAK YOU DUTCH GLOBALIST FRAUDS...AND OH GEE COCKPIT VOICE SHOWED NO EMERGENCY AND NO COMMUNICATION..WHY THE CHANGED PATH ASSES?...WHY THE FORCED TO LOWER FLIGHT?...BROKE UP IN MID AIR?.....MORE CRAP! https://facebook/photo.php?v=831127250245327 OH AND IDIOTS....WHY NOT THE CONTROL TOWER COMMUNICATIONS?...THAT WE KNOW FROM OTHER SOURCES WERE MADE TO THE TOWER THAT YOU FLAT OUT ARE LYING ABOUT?...WHY BECAUSE IT ALL IMPLICATED AND PROVES YOUR GLOBALIST FORCES IN THE LIE?AND WHAT ABOUT THE BIG LIE THAT IT WAS TAKEN DOWN BY A RUSSIAN BUK MISSILE? BUT GEE WE WILL TELL YOU IN A YEAR AS THE RESULTS ARE NOT IMPORTANT BECAUSE IT SHOW THE WESTERN POWERS AND KIEV PUPPET GOVT LYING!...BUT WHAT THE HAY....WE HAVE TO START A WAR BEFORE THAT TIME...OR THE PEOPLE OF KIEV WILL FREEZE IN JUST A COUPLE MONTHS! AND IN THE VIDEO HE DOESNT EVEN MENTION THE FLIGHT RADAR AND 3 PLANES! MH17 broke up in mid-air due to external damage - Dutch preliminary report rt/news/186256-malaysia-airlines-probe-report/?utm_source=browser&utm_medium=aplication_chrome&utm_campaign=chrome I POST ONLY FOR NEWS AND INFORMATION TO EDUCATE PEOPLE BELIEVING THIS CONSTITUTES FAIR USE FAIR USE AGREEMENT 17 U.S.C. § 107 Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 17 U.S.C. § 106 and 17 U.S.C. § 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright
Posted on: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 12:40:53 +0000