NDP Claims Of - TopicsExpress



          

NDP Claims Of Victimization ---------------------------------- First let me say that I love the NDP mouthpieces because they inspire me. They keep my brain active in processing the nonsense that they profess. No matter how you feel about them, you have to give them an A for effort and determination. They are like the Ever Ready Battery in their search of that magic bullet to blow the ULP government out of power in St.Vincent and the Grenadines. The issue with them is that they are not trained target shooters. They keep on firing scatter shots that only ricochet and hit them in their faces. The new bullets they are loading are called Victimization and their most popular guinea pigs these days are Bigger Bigs, Cecil Charles, and Papa Iton. These are individuals who the NDP mouthpieces claim have been victimized by the ULP government. Therefore, Vincentians must stand up and defend these individuals honor by electing the NDP are sending the ULP into the abyss of history. I think by now, there might be people in all four corners of the world that know the Bigger Bigs story. The government took away Bigger Bigs license because they claim his business was an environmental threat. Bigger Bigs and his supporters believe that the real reason the government took away his license was because he supported the NDP. Bigger Bigs states that he has irrefutable proof that his business was not an environmental hazard. However, he refused to go to court because he alleged that the court is corrupted by the Prime Minister. So rather than going to court, he initiated a protest campaign in the spirit of Dr.Martin Luther King, jr., although Dr.Kings protests were not about his personal finances. They were to benefit ALL non-whites in America. Nonetheless, like Dr.King, Bigger Bigs got himself arrested and was forced to go to what he has deemed the Gonsalves corrupt court system. Surprise, surprise, the corrupt court seems to have rendered justice by not sending Bigger Bigs to prison for live or banishing him from the island. So Bigger Bigs, by his own actions, has indirectly given credence to the court system and vindicated it from corruption charges. If the court system in St.Vincent was indeed corrupt as Bigger Bigs and his supporters initially alleged, then no doubt Bigger Bigs could have ended up like Marcus Mosiah Garvey who was sent to prison for mail fraud and then deported to Jamaica where he died a pauper. Garveys case was government victimization. But, if there is any victimization in Bigger Bigs case. It is self inflicted with his refusal to take the matter to court. Bigger Bigs and his supporter have also victimized all individuals who work within the court system by painting them as biased, politically motivated, Gonsalves operatives, etc., etc. Now, that these court professionals have demonstrated their impartiality, will Bigger Bigs and his supporters issue a formal apology for the assassination of their characters? The case of Papa Iton victimization is amusing. Papa Iton claims that he was laid off from work as a taxi cab driver for the Buccament Resort. However, as you listen to him tell his story, the word we replaced me right about the point where the laid off happened. Let me translate that for those of you who did not see the videotape interview made by one who calls himself Bruce Haynes on YouTube. Papa Iton alleges that he (singular) was victimized. However, he said we (plural) were called into the Boss office and told that they were being laid off. He feels (subjective) that he was victimized because he heard talk from people asking why he was working at the location. Then he said he was working at the Medical College and one day a political minister showed up and he was let go the next day. Now, we have to pay attention to how these NDP mouthpieces minds work. Where is the nexus or the link that shows that the politician that showed up at the business had something to do with Papa Itons dismissal? Please ask the NDP mouthpiece to provide that missing piece of evidence to substantiate the victimization claim. I suppose, when they hired Papa Iton at both places they didnt know that he was NDP. I live in America and I knew from his calypso that he was NDP. If the claim is the government is not hiring NDP supporters, we know that is another lie. Some of the houses in Clare Valley were reportedly built by NDP contractor. If the politician wanted Papa Iton fired, you mean, he couldnt have made a phone call rather than going specifically to the college to tell those in charge to fire him? The case of Cecil Charges appears to be another one of the NDP mountains out of a mole hill. The Facts and Circumstances in the case appear to demonstrate that Mr. Charles was grossly insubordinate to his superior. He admitted that he unilaterally made a decision without advising his superiors first. He felt that he had that sort of autonomy and his boss disagreed. Therefore, he was let go, plain and simple. Where is the victimization in this case? People are fired everyday for lesser reasons, so how can NDP mouthpieces claim that this man was victimized? None of these victimization claims are well grounded. In the case of Bigger Bigs, if there is victimization, it is self inflicted. With Papa Iton, his case is plain and simple, NDP commess. And Cecil Charles made his own bed. No one victimized him. Arnhim Eustace fired Mrs. Nichols from her job as a secretary. Was that victimization? The NDP is still firing scatter shots and they keep missing. Maybe it is time for Arnhim Eustace to get himself some new marksmen because these people he has now are on suicide missions.
Posted on: Sat, 06 Dec 2014 12:33:14 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015