Nationalistic and parliamentary solidarity started this week following a foreign land death, igniting social media aggressive sentiments after the president had declared a three national mourning days in the honour of a populous politician among his colleagues and generations. Many social media users show discontent towards the presidents decision to honour the politician who passed while in the motherly nation. Some of these social media users appear to believe that such commemoration, parliamentary solidarity and executive vigilante are disingenuous homage to public and private businesses in Juba. I believe that several social media users do share some aspects of legitimate concerns because the modern world do appreciate the importance of freedom of expression. However, those folks must also remember that certain national solidarity movements do start with certain death, depending where that death may occur to remind humanities of symbol of power, depending where that victim may settle to create a new citizenry reflection,and depending on current coincidences of timing period in a country. I would relax to be persuaded by these folkss sentiments against the presidents decision; unless,if some of them are also working as professors at institution of ethnology and cultural anthropology to believe their credibility towards originality of mourning without involvement of personal emotionalism.
Posted on: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 23:34:33 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015