Negotiations between two sovereign entities consist of the real - TopicsExpress



          

Negotiations between two sovereign entities consist of the real present danger of violence and conflict. To be able to handle these type of situations require a nerve and construction of conscious that at times lies beyond the scope of the everyday psychology. The decision making process holds consequences unforeseeable to the laymen of military strategy. This compounds when such individuals are paired in competition against a character trained in militant or guerilla thinking. The condition in today’s politics, business and civil settings has morphed into a stage that requires one to posse’s the sharpness of militant strategic decision making along with the calculated ability to measure value and cost for the benefit of the progression achieved through the negotiating in social settings. The Militant with this capacity could champion the good of the people coupled with the effectiveness of achieving such standards in logical methods. To be known for militant thinking at times draws a negative connotation, but it should not be considered as such. The militant thinker is aware that the negotiation process is taking place on a level of sovereigns and how states are to reciprocate behaviors. The dynamic of citizens negotiating with its sovereign holds a different dynamic than state-to-state communications of exchange. An individual is bound by the laws of the sovereign he or she lives under. But sovereign states are only held by the laws of the universe it is established. People uniting to form a sovereign state must in act all the functions of self –government to uphold the form of their state. This requires that when at any time the state is occupying space or exchanging goods and so forth with other states, it is a requirement of the representatives of the processes, to be mindful of all components the opponent can enact, at times subtle or overt intimidation, in the process. To be a militant thinker is the most effective thought psychology for revolutionary change. I have held firm to the belief since my investigation of people who were being oppressed by their government, that to implement this decision making in your everyday strategy to overturn tyranny holds the most power and relevance. Even during the founding of this country and the importing of the slaves the so-called forefathers held in bondage, both groups of people harbored sentiment for militant thinking and action. Your everyday motive must hold the sharp reality of positioning for opportune moments of strategic execution. The mindset allows you to see the advantages that are not assessable to others. It is calculated thinking that should weight the cost and gains with a high degree of sensitivity to fear and intimidation exuded by opponents. In the right situations you hold a powerful force factor over your competition when they simply play blind eye to the deep rooted motivations of men who play manipulative psychological tricks to achieve certain outcomes. You have the potential with militant thinking to a degree to snuff out false facades which are psycho-behavioral short cuts that used by pacifist. Militant thinking is achieved through conscious decision making from a psychological paradigm of sovereign thinking. The function is to hold firm to the scale or opportunity cost and lost, when these are carefully weighted with the elements and conditions associated with moral perceived from the object gained. A militant’s decision making is centered on the progression of the mission.
Posted on: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:17:02 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015