No, "Transatlanticism" European! 0050 / .... The French government and the employers do not yet want to keep the reforms already implemented and want to go even further in the social regression. Two reasons. On the one hand, even sorely hurt in recent years, social protection as result of past struggles of workers is incompatible with neoliberalism. On the other hand, it is about who will take on the crisis. To save the neoliberal order that failed to save their privileges and be like before the great crisis of 2007, the ruling classes are determined to dismantle the social welfare and pensions in particular. A new extension of the contribution period is on the table, delaying the age of retirement is enviseagé and a new attack against the public sector pensions. If the statutory retirement age was postponed, there is concern that where you can retire at full rate without any discount even though it was not required contribution period (currently 65) is also rejected. To justify these new regressions, indestructible untruths are mobilized, either on the impact of demographic changes and the increase in life expectancy or on the issue of funding. The following will discuss these topics in detail and refute the idea, apparently common sense, that work should be because we are living longer. While the average age of retirement activity is 58.8 years and that companies get rid of their older workers, increasing the contribution period or postpone the age of retirement would result in falling even more the level of pensions. The government, by removing all obstacles to combining work with retirement admits, and it is no longer possible to live with his pension. Moreover, it would undermine the solidarity in wanting to maintain the work of older workers as mass unemployment, especially among young people, continues. What sense is there to try to keep the work of older workers while this has resulted in the assumption by the Company of additional unemployed? Promoted in the name of fairness, these "reforms" mask a desire to weaken the solidarity mechanisms that are the foundation of Social Security, in order to change pension plans to the individual forms of savings. Thus, the company would be given to set community standards, both in terms of sharing between working time and rest time that the standard of living of the elderly. Removing any idea of standards accompanying social progress, we refer to any alleged individual responsibility. Because those in power have a good heart in the background, they will consent to recognize the existence of a very small minimum or take little account of the hardship for some while degrading the standard of living for all.
Posted on: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 11:31:32 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015