``Normal scientific progress was viewed as development-by-accumulation of accepted facts and theories. Kuhn argued for an episodic model in which periods of such conceptual continuity in normal science were interrupted by periods of revolutionary science. The discovery of anomalies during revolutions in science leads to new paradigms. New paradigms then ask new questions of old data, move beyond the mere puzzle-solving of the previous paradigm, change the rules of the game and the map directing new research. It may sound immodest, my research often calls for ``Paradigm Shift and disliked by many: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Structure_of_Scientific_Revolutions
Posted on: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 03:42:25 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015