Not Humbug: Christmas Trees and Climate Change Source Newsroom: Saint Josephs University Newswise — Given recent extreme weather events – the summer’s brutal heat and subsequent drought, followed by Superstorm Sandy’s disastrous path – newly green-conscious consumers may be wondering how to lessen their carbon footprint this holiday season. Plant biologist Clint Springer, Ph.D., assistant professor of biology at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia, says that buying a real Christmas tree may not solve the world’s climate ills, but it is a step in the right direction. “At this time of year, choosing a real Christmas tree is one way that an average person can make a difference in terms of climate change,” Springer says. “A study as recent as 2009 (Ellipsos) concluded that a 7-foot cut tree’s impact on climate is 60 percent less than a 7-foot artificial tree used for six years. So while cut trees are not carbon-neutral, in terms of carbon-use, they are better than artificial trees.” Springer notes many families choose artificial trees because they may not have easy access to real trees, which could be too costly, or because they have tree allergies. “Farm-raised trees are too young to be reproductive in most cases, so pollen is not an issue,” says Springer. It’s possible, though, that some people might be sensitive to the natural scent of the trees.” In that case, Springer recommends choosing pines over firs, which usually carry a weaker scent.
Posted on: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 19:02:44 +0000
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015