Now following from that logic, many will deduce similarities with the rolls in the supreme court or now an electronic database to be the same, I.e. a register documenting changes made to a name via a deed poll. They will thus hold me at fault, for not obeying the terms of the contracted poll which they will claim was and is executed before any enrolling begins. If there are errors in the enrolment process which requires the statutory declarants oath and exhibits to be produced, then that is merely grounds for a dislodgement. Or as freddy boy will say it a hammer from above top, dislodging the blocked nail along with some plaster. Although ugly and messy and certainly very embarrassing for the courts to ever admit when reputations are at stake, I will persevere for common sense will win the day even if the paint offer is not accepted. Yet, I have this urge to not stop there and challenge the deed itself going against the norm. The norm will state deed executed, you bound sir - make another for any change. In fact the majority will probably be of this view. That is a given. Mention any mental health and it is likely in all probability the reasoning I am to put foward, will be dismissed and not given any hearing whatsoever. Pinpointing errors for portioning blame is not my agenda. Having my say for many other absurdities with the current law that this throws up, and needs scrutiny is. Why should this be a private and confidential matter subject to an internal review to be handled sensitively behind the door so to speak, when it affects every citizen in England and Wales. How am I doing have I gathered an audience yet? Please put some coins in the kitty so I can hire a solicitor to represent my case.....until then and without further delay ...I shall begin....
Posted on: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:16:53 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015