OF TALKS AND ZANU From now going forward, i will never put PF in front of the abbreviation Zanu. The reason for this being that there is nothing Patriotic with Zanu. Nothing at all, and those affected by this, please swallow your pride and live with it. The recent talk about Rugare Gumbo being used as a front to lure the MDCT and Civic organisations to the negotiating table is a positive development in two ways. Firstly it is an indication that Zanu has come to the realisation that they can’t and have failed to rig the economy and there is now an urgent need for big capable brains to take it over. Secondly it is simply an indication that they admit that the last election was a fuss. However, the Zanu and Mugabe mentality of wanting the opposition (MDCT in particular) to admit that they won that election fairly is not only a delusion, but also a fallacy of the devil in deep slumber dreaming of having legitimately taken over God’s thrown before he was thrown into hell. It is Zanu’s belief held with strong conviction by themselves only in the entire world that they won the last election against undisputed and superior evidence to the contrary, which the whole world and SADC knows that it was a massive theft of an election, no wonder SADC’s report never said the election was a “credible” one. Just to add to this, the SADC Statement’s concluding remarks stated, “On behalf of the chairperson of the Organ on Politics, Defence and Security Cooperation, His Excellency Jakaya Mrisho Kikwete, President of the United Republic of Tanzania and on behalf of the entire SADC family, I wish to sincerely congratulate ZEC and the people of Zimbabwe for holding free and peaceful harmonised elections on 31 July 2013.” There is nowhere in the whole SADC report where the election was said to be “fair” and “credible”. Yes, Mugabe made sure violence is minimal (to give some resemblance of reformation against the 2008 genocide) but the mere non-existent of violence does not in any way say the election was either free or can it be said to have been a credible one. In that regard, whether they (Zanu) agree or not, we still maintain the same position that the election was rigged and Mugabe is not the legitimate President of Zimbabwe. In line with that, negotiations (if ever they are going to be held) they will be between The Movement for Democratic Change represented by our President Dr Morgan Tsvangirai and Zimbabwe African National Union (they can put PF if it pleases them) represented by their President Robert Mugabe, nothing more than that. Biti does not represent any political party, so he is out of the equation. His idea of “mooing” that he fired President Tsvangirai is a pipe dream that will never manifest in two million years. His was, and is defined as a failed coup. Not even in a dream will the MDCT accept Mugabe and his Zanu to have won that election freely, fairly and credibly. It is decorated and well known the world over that Zanu stole the election and it is with that conviction that the MDCT and we the supporters will never go into any negotiation that has Mugabe’s signature resembling some form of superiority in anything, never. If our leadership decide to compromise of the notion that Zanu stole the election, then its them in that top hierarchy who will enter into any agreement with Zanu and not us the majority. Zanu yajaira kuvhara vanhu too much. This time havalume. Povho yaramba zvemadhisinyongoro
Posted on: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:28:40 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015