Ok, new take on evolution here, and development. Prepare for some fun speculation. In the growing Earth hypothesis, Earth is viewed as a growing quasi-organism whose growth is driven by a plasma fusion (scalar or neutrino) process at the her core. This theory is articulated in part by Konstantin Meyl. It begins with the observation that Earths magnetic field cannot be the product of a posited molten iron core, as iron loses its magnetism at temperatures well below molten temperature. What is more, evidence from history shows, among other things, that the number of hours comprising a day has increased over time, suggesting a lower mass and smaller, faster-spinning circumference; that dinosaurs were much too large to be supported by leg bones on the assumption of a gravitational force equivalent to todays; and that NASA evidence shows that Earth is literally growing and increasing in mass. Meyls hypothesizes that Earth has a plasmatic core spinning at absolute zero and whose spin is not only perpetual because superconductive, but also creates eddy currents that are the source of Earths magnetic field. Following this, and given the data and corroborating evidence that Earths mass has increased over time, it appears to me that Earth probably evolved through stages ~~ quantum stages, if you will ~~ whereby at its earliest stage, having then its lowest field density, Earth comprised but a plasmatic sphere. As this sphere grew in size, and as Earths field strength correspondingly increased, there would at some threshold time appear the formation of a gaseous layer. Following this, and in the same dual expanding-contracting or expanding-densifying dynamic, there would the appear a liquid layer, then finally a solid layer. Dinosaurs, for their part, apparently appeared when Earths mass density was at a level that the corresponding field density, normally called gravitational field, was low enough to allow them to support themselves, to move, and for some to run and sprint. This would likely have been the time when all continents were connected, as their shapes suggest they were, in a single unbroken layer of a much smaller Earth (25% of present size). It may have been the gradual increase in field density that drove dinosaurs into obsolescence, for they simply cannot inhabit field strengths what they currently are. It would seem to me that, from this, one can speculate that most of Earths evolutionary changes likely tracked its self-creating growth and densification, such that the true theory of evolution, if you will, is a dual complementary evolutionary-creative view where these two are inseparably present in any change one cares to name. Other implications are quite fun and, on the whole, staggering for what they suggest for our self understanding, how the universe truly works, etc. we can discuss these, but in the mean time enjoy some of the attached videos. I dont place much stock in the authors theory of the science behind planetary growth, but his videos are fantastic and mind-blowing to watch. https://m.youtube/playlist?list=PL5A1097F4E958728D
Posted on: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 22:05:07 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015