Once again, Obama and Kerry (as well as the White House in general, by proxy) have exposed themselves as the complete fools (and criminals)! From the day one, it was obvious to many reasonable people as myself that the tragedy of MH17 flight was not as black and white as the U.S. officials tried it to present. From a second this flight was shot, there was a Spanish air traffic controller who was very clear on who is to blame (I posted his messages on the day of the tragedy - he said, without any doubt, that the Ukraine is to blame for this downing). There were some witnesses who supported the air controllers message. Moreover, the Ukrainian governments suspicious actions were the proofs by themselves. Two-three days later, a few military professionals published convincing evidences that the nature of the shooting didnt coincide with the official version pushed by the west. Russia was never the one to be blamed for this tragedy that took 198 peoples lives! The Ukrainian government - with the egregiously criminal intent - is to be accounted for this murder (which should be persecuted in the normal world. But we dont have this normalcy, alas!), and the U.S. government is the one that rushed to cover up their puppets crime. Or, who knows, perhaps some of its folks were the ones who were in charge of this crime (planning and managing)? Further, there’s this crucial 21 July photo-reconstruction of that cockpit-fragment positioned into place on the aircraft as it had originally been in that intact-airliner: https://twitter/EzraBraam. (Sometimes that doesn’t work, so here’s another screen of it from someone who copied it.) Looking at that photo-reconstruction, one can easily tell that the SU-25 or other fighter-jet that was firing into the cockpit from the pilot’s left side didn’t just riddle the area surrounding the pilot with bullets, but that it then targeted-in specifically onto the pilot himself, producing at his location a huge gaping hole in the side of the plane precisely at the place where the pilot was seated. Furthermore, this gaping hole was produced by shooting into the plane, precisely at the pilot, from below and to the pilot’s left, which is where that fighter-jet was located — not from above the airliner, and not from beside it, and also not from below it. In other words: this was precise and closely-targeted firing against the pilot himself, not a blast directed broadly against, and aiming to hit, the plane anywhere, to bring it down. Haisenko explained how this penetration of the plane, though it was targeted specifically at the pilot, caused immediately a breaking-apart of the entire aircraft. Other readers have responded to my news-report about Haisenko’s article, by saying that shrapnel from a Buk missile could similarly have caused those holes into the side of the cockpit. However, that objection ignores another key feature of Haisenko’s analysis. Haisenko said there: “You can see the entry and exit holes. The edge of a portion of the holes is bent inwards. These are the smaller holes, round and clean, showing the entry points most likeley that of a 30 millimeter caliber projectile. The edge of the other, the larger and slightly frayed exit holes showing shreds of metal pointing produced by the same caliber projectiles. Moreover, it is evident that … these exit holes of the outer layer of the double aluminum reinforced structure are shredded or bent — outwardly!” What this means is that in order to have some of those holes frayed inwardly and the other holes frayed outwardly, there had to have been a second fighter-jet firing into the cockpit from the airliner’s right-hand side. That’s critically important, because no ground-based missile (or shrapnel therefrom) hitting the airliner could possibly have produced firing into the cockpit from both sides of the plane. It had to have been a hail of bullets from both sides, that brought the plane down, in that circumstance. This is Haisenko’s main discovery, by his pointing that out. You can’t have projectiles going in both directions — into the left-hand-side fuselage panel from both its left and right sides — unless they are coming at the panel from different directions. Nobody before Haisenko had noticed that the projectiles had ripped through that panel from both its left side and its right side. This is what rules out any ground-fired missile. globalresearch.ca/evidence-is-now-conclusive-two-ukrainian-government-fighter-jets-shot-down-malaysian-airlines-mh17-it-was-not-a-buk-surface-to-air-missile/5394814
Posted on: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 22:56:56 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015