One day I will write a book on how three losers in a national - TopicsExpress



          

One day I will write a book on how three losers in a national election tried to wrestle an election from one winner! So one loser who came third (whom I will refer to as PP) was the head of state. After realising that her position was untenable and that no matter what she couldnt argue for a win, so she colluded with second and fourth losers (whom I will refer to MCP and UDF) and offered her machinery which included cash, 2 commissioners, a spin of lies to discredit the winner (whom I will refer to as DPP). They cooked up a story that the winner had stolen votes. There was no evidence but just a lie that the losing president concocted with her fellow losers. The Loser 1 had no evidence of their win but a bunch of concocted inflated figures for their tally centre. They mounted a huuge propaganda to discredit the winner. You see the PP had done that kind of propaganda before against the real winners brother when he was head of state. It had become her habit. She wore that habit like she wore her shoulder cloth whatever she called it. Now she also wanted to rape the Constitution and formulate her own laws straight out of her head with no parliament etc to annul the election she had lost. She ordered ( in her hallucination) to have an election in 90 days and excluded herself from the proposed illegal non legally existent run off. People worried whether she had lost her mind or what. She was condemned by everyone except the two other losers. Who failed to take the opportunity to stand up for democracy. It was rumoured that they were conniving to steal an election. Yes indeed MCP claimed they has 73 MPs from this election (wait a minute: where did they get this figure? From the UNOFFICIAL TALLY) So according to MCP this figure was correct but the other figure from the same UNOFFICIAL TALLY which showed MCP had lost was not correct according to the same loser. So PARLIAMENT FIGURES WERE RIGHT AND PRESIDENTIAL FIGURES WERE WRONG. All from the same unofficial tally (it was going to be wrong to be wrong as long as they were not winning). So despite the fact PP got only got 12 MPs. They did not accuse losers MCP the ones who had 73 MPs of stealing the election but DPP who won the Presidency and got 44 MPs. Oh I forgot MCP said that if they won 73 MPs then they won the Presidency. But they had been there before. Where they were majority in parliament in 2004. Also any person who understands how Presidential and parliamentary system works in Malawi knows for sure that the voting pattern is different. Wait: MCP had been out of governed for so long they cannot understand such a basic thing.
Posted on: Tue, 27 May 2014 19:54:46 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015