One thing I like about this is, considering we live in a republic, and thus the sovereign people make the laws for the court of their jurisdiction, we can start to get back to what the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Inc. Is incorporated to do: Suggest ways of living and ways of being together so that we might better our communities, these suggestions come in the form of statutory codes. Instead, we observe these statutory codes A.K.A. suggestions, as laws. But they are not. They are only suggestions in the court of the sovereign. Unless of course the sovereign allows them! Then they are valid as law, not because the state wrote them and thus they have authority, No! Rather because the sovereign decreed these statutes to be law they are now law in the court of the sovereign. End of discussion. This all just goes back to the idea that we are kings/sovereign without subjects. So we have infinite capacity to set rule of law ourselves, but only within our jurisdiction. And sovereign people can only have sovereignty over another if they have been injured by said sovereign. Then they become a defendant, someone who is under the jurisdiction of the court of the sovereign, and as defendant they are obliged under penalty of perjury, to answer all inquiries and obey all lawful orders of the court of the sovereign. The way you keep from becoming a defendant in the municipal court judges court, is a counterclaim against their court under the challenge of jurisdiction... This automatically makes you the counter-plaintiff and them the counter-defendant, in your court, or the court of the sovereign(if so duly stipulated to the court, meaning lawfully and statutorily stipulated to the court). https://facebook/drugpolicy/photos/a.10150420854369245.417985.7229514244/10152883039849245/?type=1
Posted on: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 16:15:18 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015