Op the site What do they know stelde Joseph Keog onderstaande vragen aan Her Majestys Treasury: Dear Sir or Madam, Can you clarify and/or confirm the following: 1) 97% of Bank of England stock was transferred in 1966 into the name of the Treasury Solicitor. 2) 3% (some of which as yet has never been redeemed) is owned by unnamed shareholders whose identity, you are not at liberty to disclose. 3) The named principal shareholder of the 97% of the Bank of Englands stock specifically the Treasury Solicitor, is wholly representative of the British Government. 4) The named principal shareholder or current shareholder allocation is not subject to any lease agreement insofar as the current allocation will be restructured across existing shareholders named and unnamed subject to a prior agreed time frame. 5) Assuming 3. is affirmed, can you confirm therefore that all payments/dividends received by the Treasury from the Bank of England are solely used in its dealings with the UK economy and as such the Treasury is not subject to any deductions or contractually obligated payments to any party external to the process of managing the UK economy. 6)The Bank of England is in debt to the private unnamed shareholders who have not redeemed their stock for an amount equal to the principal value redeemable in 1966 plus its compounded interest for the last 43 years. Assuming 6 is correct. It is not unreasonable to suggest then that the minority shareholders given the real value of their stock, can never be repaid or bought out. And as such these silent partners are in fact significant creditors to the Bank of England and the UK economy. I look forward to your clarifications. Yours faithfully, Joseph Keogh Her Majestys Treasury bleef het antwoord schuldig op de vragen van Joseph Keog...
Posted on: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:09:37 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015