Over 4000 words now, of nothing but a dialogue of the mind in unconsciousness, where a guy has a conversation with two mental voices: one that can only speak through asking questions, and the other which can make only statements. FINALLY, the plot has its boot in the doorway and I get to my first bit of rhetoric, from the asker of questions: “Am I rude to interrupt now when in the very words of the one who speaks so boldly there is great danger? If the one who is actually being honest about that one’s ignorance appears to be truly clueless regarding the answer to my question [who are you], does the mind of that one have any further possibilities but to automatically accept, as if it was always known to be true, any suggestions given by another, even to the complete delusion of one’s own identity? I ask again, is the one who admitted having ignorance really not able to experience their own identity coming back to this one’s own awareness, or does this one need the voice of another to suggest it? Have I sought to tell this one who this one is, or done anything other than cause this one to search objectively for the truth on their very own?” (Youre reaction to that is likely the same as the characters)
Posted on: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 05:46:43 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015