Over the past four decades, U.S. courts have ruled that plaintiffs - TopicsExpress

Over the past four decades, U.S. courts have ruled that plaintiffs making discrimination claims under the Fair Housing Act don’t have to prove intentional bias. Civil rights advocates simply have to show that lenders, insurers, developers or government agencies acted in ways that had a “disparate,” or unequal, impact on minority groups. Now, the Supreme Court is weighing whether to hear an appeal from Texas officials who argue that intent to discriminate must be proven and that the “disparate impact” standard is too loose an interpretation of the landmark 1968 law that prohibited discrimination in housing.

Hello hello hello!! We are delighted to announce that weve had an

"Ya la esperaré fuera, sin cámaras. A esa hija de puta la quemo

copio: MADRID, ¡¡¡Hola a tod@s!!! Se nos vuelve a plantear un

Drew Bartlett on Friday was named deputy secretary for water

Please check some clips from the The Unheard Voice in my Yeng

This kitchen was designed with the beach in mind! The white

Witam wszystkich dzisiaj dowiedzialem się ciekawego

Regulatory compliance costs on United States businesses and

CHIKAS QUE EMOCION..SE QUE ESTE VIAJECITO SERA ESPECTACULAR. No