Part 3 of the Anthropology Series on the Hidden Origin of Homo Sapiens --daniel Introduction In order to understand how the created, Cro-Magnon man differs from other evolved life on our world, an investigation into the structure of life, itself, is a necessary prerequisite. Once the natural norm is defined, deviations from that norm can be investigated and consequences determined. This paper will cover two basic concepts, as energetic consequences: life and death, along with the evolution of these processes: reincarnation and ascension. Life, as a natural consequence of the postulates of the Reciprocal System, is covered in detail by Dewey Larson in his book, Beyond Space and Time.1 In hopes of defining the basic pattern of what causes natural death and what happens during, and after, the death of the physical body, the concepts of death, reincarnation and ascension are extrapolated from the core concepts of cultural mythology and theology, correlated to corresponding concepts in a framework of a universe of motion. This information can then be extrapolated to see where mankind, as a species, is heading. The pretext of this paper, based on the concepts proposed in Geochronology2 and New World Religion,3 is that Cro-Magnon man, from which modern man is a direct descendant, is a hybrid of the evolving life on the planet plus an “extra-terrestrial” or “divine” influence that was introduced by a species collectively referred to as the “SMs” that colonized the planet in ancient times, creating the Mu and Atlantean epochs.4 The progenitors of this hybrid species of man are commonly referred to as the Biblical Adam and Eve, so this hybrid approach is a mix between Darwinian views and theological ones—both are correct. Man was created and is now evolving on his own, as a distinct species. Terminology is going to be difficult as many of the words have subjective meanings to the reader. To help alleviate this difficulty, the terms will be defined prior to being used, so context can be maintained. There will be those that disagree with the choice of specific words, but these are what we’ve been using in the scientific underground for 30 years and have held up well. It is the concept being related that is important, not the word used to express it. There will also be those who vehemently oppose Larson’s concept of consciousness being a consequence of life, rather than matter being a consequence of consciousness. I ask that you “suspend disbelief” for the moment, as it is a reciprocal relation. Asking “what came first” is like asking if the inside or outside of a box came first—neither did. Once you have a box, you’ve got an inside and an outside. The same situation exists with consciousness; it’s all a matter of perspective. Life To the best of my knowledge, Dewey Larson has the only theory, the Reciprocal System (RS), that deduces both life and ethical consciousness as a natural consequence of its Postulates. What Larson proposed in his book, Beyond Space and Time, is that life is essentially a stable combination of matter and antimatter.5 Most physicists will tell you that when matter and antimatter meet, they cancel each other out and you get an explosive result. What Larson found was that matter and antimatter can also meet “out of phase” with each other, such that they form a stable, more complex structure: the living cell. Still an explosion, but a constructive explosion of life, rather than a destructive explosion of radiation. Because of this mix of material and cosmic (antimatter) motions, the living cells operate primarily in the intermediate speed range, analogous to the processes in stars, but due to this stable balance, the process is at much lower temperatures. To quote Delenn from Babylon 5, “We are star-stuff,”6 literally. This unique understanding of the living structure as an aggregate of a physical, spatial body and an invisible, temporal body, allows an investigation into that “other realm,” the cosmic half of life that philosophers and spiritualists have identified as the soul or mind (as in the conventional, New Age concept of Body/Mind/Spirit). Whereas soul and mind have many connotations, the Medieval Latin term, anima7 will be used, as commonly used by psychologists. Anima will be used to refer to this “soul” half of the living organism, the unobserved presence in 3D time. According to the Reciprocal System, the physical8 universe consists of two sectors of expression, existing 90° out of phase; each the antithesis of the other; two perspectives of scalar motion: Material sector (matter): three, coordinate dimensions of space with one dimension of clock time (duration). This is the observable, measurable sector of our everyday experience, known to the 19th and early 20th century researchers as “ponderable matter.” Cosmic sector (antimatter): three, coordinate dimensions of time, with one dimension of clock space (distance). This is the origin of etheric phenomena (“imponderable matter”) and is not directly observable nor measurable from space. We can indirectly measure how time changes space, by observing how material structures change when influenced by temporal ones. However, when confronted with certain, observed phenomena such as ethical behavior and psychic ability, Larson found that the two sectors of his physical universe did not supply sufficient relationships to account for these features and he added a 3rd, nonphysical sector to hold all the evidence and observations that were yet to be sorted out and placed into the theoretical framework of the Reciprocal System. He called this third sector the Ethical sector, and the structures created within it, control units.9 Unfortunately, Larson died of old age before completing this study. Larson’s concept of “sectors” also maps to the esoteric concepts of ontological planes of existence: Sector # Sector Name Esoteric Plane 1 Material Physical 2 Cosmic Astral 3 Ethical Causal
Posted on: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 00:40:38 +0000