Paul Chandler Chandler, Peter Mizla, Roger Streit, Andree Zalesk, Glenn Saunders and Anne Vandeven, this is probably the most interesting response to Naomi Kleins book Ive come across. The question I keep going back to--and Ive actually stumped some people on this in recent days!--is: if Kleins arguments are by definition invalid, how does one address the fact that Bill McKibben has made similar arguments over the past 25 years about the perils of free-market fundamentalism? Are people suggesting that both Klein and McKibben should be disqualified from participating in the discussion of how best to address pollution? blogs.hbr.org/2014/09/we-dont-have-to-ditch-capitalism-to-fight-climate-change/
Posted on: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 16:57:41 +0000