Pertaining the Relatio, first of all, how does one go pass the smell? You know, ontologically speaking. Given that I dont think Saint Anthony will be inspiration for the Angels when the fish are brought to shore so to pick the good ones and throw away the rotten ones. Again: Ontologically speaking. And this not havent read the, lets call it document for practical reasons, but just some excerpts here and there. So this seems to relate to my Guardian Angel, one, I take it, not given to violence, say, as a defining characteristic, nor given to baseball, for that matter, but while, well, reading this document he sort of got, I dont know, enthusiasms. Enthusiasms. The sheep recognise Their Shepperds Voice, so Ive been taught. And that press conference together with the document, man, it was so much The Shepperds Voice that you could almost pick up his tone. I mean, bullshit like that, its gotta be divine. I think this synod could be compared to the cuban missile crisis. My point being, does one have to squeeze a couple of rounds or a shot across the bow will suffice? I dont know if this my be reading stuff where one shouldnt, concerning Prophet Elias role in the end times, namely his ironic or sarcastic attitude, as one understands from the episode of him, Elias, battling against the prophets or priests of baal. You know, in the sense of, you better make some more noise because your god might be sleeping. But considering the role of Prophet Elias in the end times, specifically his attitude in that particular episode, with some part of the Book of Revelation, the one regarding the 13th chapter, where its mentioned the beast coming out of the sea and the one coming out of the earth. (Before we proceed, it should be noted that the speculative interpretation that follows does not intend to nullify or confuse or substitute other interpretations given about this chapter or intervenients in Revelation when it comes to a more literal interpretation, specifically the ones that have already been given from Heaven, via Our Lady, for instance, pointing out and qualifying certain historical people as such in the literal negative sense that Revelation points out about these two beasts in chapter 13th. Moreover because both interpretations dont have to contradict nor nullify themselves inevitably so to hold as being true, but having more than one meaning.) So this one beast comes out of the sea and the other comes out of the earth. Previously, in Revelation, theres this episode of an Angel, in chapter 10, that comes down from Heaven, with an open book or small scroll that had been opened, and placing his right foot on the sea and his left foot on the land. To be continued.
Posted on: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 03:21:17 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015