Please Critique... I just thought of this now: Argument for a relevant distinction between belief, intention and will. 1. “Beliefs” can only be a potential thing. (De Se Experiences) (Mind-Awareness) (Semiotics) (Father) Ex: I believe X (is True). 2. “Intentions” are about relationships between mnemonics devices and their negations. (De Dicto Experiences) (Logic) (Syntax) (Son) Ex: I Intend to go to a store. 3. “Wills” can only be about a particular thing. (De Re Experiences) (Semantic) (Spirit) Ex: I Will to go to a that Publix. C. Therefore beliefs, Intentions and wills are unified but not uniform. *C2. It can currently only be said that reality is unified but not uniform (De Dicto) - Or Triune (De Se/De Re). Argument for a Trinity (Personal Triune Reality) 1. Only a person can believe. (Father) 2. Only a person can intend. (Son) 3. Only a person can will. (Spirit) 4. No one person can experience belief, intend, and will simultaneously about qualia. C. Reality is a Trinity (Personal Tri-Unity). John 1:12 - Yet to all who did receive him, to those who believed in his name(Truth), he gave the right to become children of God.
Posted on: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 17:45:09 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015