PressPakistan debate Hi all, I was expecting that being a - TopicsExpress



          

PressPakistan debate Hi all, I was expecting that being a responsible office holder, secretary press club will take time out to read the total objections so far filed. These are of course not 50 but about 400 (details on Jago Press Club FB page). This clearly shows that the so called scrutiny committee was a rubber stamp and not independent enough to take decisions. Is the secretary ready to swear on oath that there are no non-journalist elements? If he is wrong is he willing to leave club politics? The types of people given membership in NPC were described by me in another thread of this group discussion from where the secretary club has run away. Secondly, I have lot of respect for senior journalists and I am sure they will not feel being wronged if given life time membership beyond club politics especially when it is in accordance with the constitution. The secretary press clubs concern about some of these senior journalists honour is best reflected in his own article published in Daily Nai Baat dated 10 sep 12. As regards the board membership of NGO, these are honorary, unpaid, voluntary positions accepted by professional journalists across the world. There are examples of senior journalists in Pakistan being on the board of media, journalism and educational institutions. Of course they have to be well educated and experienced in the field apart from being the press club member only. But how can someone justify Senior NGO full time employees being given council membership? We should not hide behind big journalistic names to cover up for our corruption and corrupt practices. Let us be frank, if only public funds and plots were not the attraction and a way to make big money for club management, no one would have cared defending illegal memberships of the NPC. In fact saving public funds and money is the only reason Jago is fighting this unpopular battle, which is of course very popular among professional journalists. Matiullah Jan Team Jago On 14-Dec-2014, at 2:54 pm, [email protected] wrote: Hi all, This discussion is like famous proverbcrow is white. Jago panel is insulting media community and honorable member of npc by declaring them as fake or property dealers. Jago panel has pointed almost 50 names to check their credentials.Each of them rerquested to come and clearify. His/her position despite their seniroty.most of them came and presented their data and position.some the names were talat hussain, mushtaq minhas, sohial iqbal, farida hafeez, tahir mughal, nazir zaidi, bilal thaeem, shafqat munir and several others. Community is the best judge to decide that these gentelmen are genuine or fake. 2i satnd by my words that jago panel has recomended the name of Zia ud din sab to convert his memebr ship in life time associate member and with draw his voting rights. 3. I respect people so I don want to name , but biggest crusader against Ngo is himself is memebr bord of drectors of a Ngo. Dear friends , under no pressure npc elected body will with draw voting right of any genuine memebrs.inshallah, we will defend the rights of our community. Tariq ch. Sent from my BlackBerry® Smartphone provided by Ufone
Posted on: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 07:42:32 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015