Pretty interesting history which raises many questions .... His alleged ideological causes were as contradictory as his attire. First claiming for years to be a pro-Western liberal Shiaa, dressed as a Shiaa cleric, his recent shift to supporting ISIS terrorists would mean he was backing a terrorist front of Wahabists - enemies of Iran and the Shaia communities across the entire Muslim World that depend on Tehran for protection. It would also mean he was adopting an ideology that at least rhetorically claims to stand in complete opposition to the West he had previously claimed to admire. While Australian authorities seemed perfectly comfortable with Boroujerdi/Monis/Manteghis continuously disruptive behavior, genuine leaders across Australias Muslim community implored the Australian government to investigate him. In a 2008 Australian article titled, Call to probe mystery Shia cleric, it was reported that: FEDERAL agents have been urged by the nations senior Shia leader, Kamal Mousselmani, to investigate an Iranian man purporting to be a prominent Islamic cleric. Sheik Mousselmani told The Australian yesterday the mystery cleric - who has been identified as Ayatollah Manteghi Boroujerdi on his website after appearing under the name Sheik Haron - was not a genuine Shia spiritual leader. He said there were no ayatollahs - supreme Shia scholars - in Australia and none of his fellow spiritual leaders knew who Ayatollah Boroujerdi or Sheik Haron was. We dont know him and we have got nothing to do with him, Sheik Mousselmani said. The federal police should investigate who he is. It should be their responsibility. What could have possibly motivated the Australian government to continue giving a clear and persistent menace to society free reign?
Posted on: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 12:34:51 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015