Private property protected by the state is an assumption liberal economics does not question and jumps past that huge force and influence in social and economics interactions before it begins its inquire into economics. Liberal Economics (which is what Anarcho-Capitalism is based on) never acknowledges how one persons rights to property take away everyone that does not own it rights away from the use of the that property. Thus in a society where a minority of rich people own all the productive property (housing, farm land, factories etc) the very means of human survival, the majority that does not own property must by rents to and work for the private owners, thus effectively being enslaved. Slaved by not a chain, but deny the means to be independent from the capitalist system, making them a free range slave going around begging different bosses to hire them for a wage, hoping to get hired before position are filled or face poverty Why Capitalism is not Voluntary and why we should question the idea that people can control vast amounts of productive property and withhold it from people even though they do not personally use it, also saying vague shit about homesteading as a justification for private property does not cut it, as homesteading justification for private property ignores the historical genocides and the reality that if you walk around your city the buildings where built by workers almost never the property owners. for those horrified at the idea of people not being allowed to own vast amounts of property, remember 9/10 of the worlds population does not own property - their home, land to grow food or any means of being independent from those that do (aka not have rent themselves out to those that do own property). anarcho-capitalism is a fringe movement born out of a liberal economist (whose living conditions are much better than that of a worker in the third world experiencing the voluntary nature of capitalism), while anti capitalist anarchism has had millions of people involved over more than 150, from revolutions to autonomous communities, disrupting economics and world leader summits (for obvious reason) to developing communities withing the urban landscape, while anarcho-capitalism is mainly just people imagine an ideal capitalism.
Posted on: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 01:03:23 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015