Question! Interesting theory! My favorite part was, We are in the center of our own reference frame being able to look back in time in every direction at the beauty of the stars. We can also look down into individual reference frames seeing the future unfold photon by photon relative to that frame of reference. However, not all theories that accurately depict or describe phenomena (no matter how nice they sound) are actually correct when we start measuring things. The problem with this theory is youre going to need mountains of evidence to undermine the standard model, the big bang, and perhaps the recently-discovered Higgs mechanism -- all of which seem to contradict your theory. So, you can start by answering these questions: • You theory says, consciousness is electrical activity that is aware of its own electrical potential. This is possible because the light photon is the carrier of the electromagnetic force.... • Problems with that: In what way does being a carrier of electromagnetism qualify as awareness? Further, by what mechanism is electricity able to become aware of itself -- what are its sense organs, and how do they emerge (if any)? Could this self-awareness be reproduced in a lab setting? Could pure electricity ever pass a Turing test, with the appropriate organization and amplitude? Does electrical awareness require a structure (like a brain)? If so, why is the structure not included as a requisite for awareness? • You theory says, It is because consciousness is always in the centre of its own reference frame that we have the concept of ‘mind’ with each one of us having our own personal view of the Universe... • Problems with that: What does it mean for consciousness to be in the center of its own reference frame? What is a reference frame? Is it observable or abstract? Isnt feeling like youre in the center of a reference frame a result of consciousness and not the cause? • Your theory says, The Universe is a continuum with spacetime as an emergent property with an Arrow of Time for each object or life form with a future coming into existence relative to their energy & momentum with each new photon electron coupling or dipole moment. • Problems with that: Because concepts like past, present, future or the arrow of time, and even general object-orientation are all emergent functions of the neocortex, it might not make sense to even discuss the universe as a construct, if youre dismissing the idea of spacetime as a requisite for such a universe. If were talking about objects or events at all, were already granting that spacetime exists. To talk about the universe before or without spacetime is identical to talking about nothing. Im not saying a universe, as a construct, without spacetime is impossible, but if you are saying that, then I want to see some evidence for it. I love the ideas you have put forth, and the passion, but I wish you would channel it into something more scientific... abandon the word salad Answers! • What we have is a physical process in electromagnetism that can qualify as awareness relative to the structure of the individuals’ brain. Only when electrical activity in the individuals’ brain has stopped is that person certified as dead. • Light has momentum and momentum is frame dependent, so we have a process that will naturally form reference frames. Once again this is part of a physical process and is not abstract. The idea can be seen in Einstein’s Relativity each object has its own reference frame. When the object move spacetime moves relative to the energy and momentum of the object. It is a dynamic process with reference frames continuously coming in and out of existence. Feeling like youre in the centre of a reference frame a result of consciousness being part of this physical process. • Yes in this theory The Universe is a continuum with spacetime as an emergent property with an Arrow of Time for each object or life form with a future coming into existence relative to their energy & momentum with each new photon electron coupling or dipole moment. But the theory does not dismiss spacetime as a requisite for such a universe. It is just the process is totally dynamic and interactive the Universe is not a construct it is a process. The greater the energy and momentum of an object the slower time will run and the greater the time dilation. This is a universal process and is the same for the planets as it is for plant life that we use for salad! https://youtube/watch?v=7nMS5jJQP8c
Posted on: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:11:01 +0000