Question by Elena: You taught us about planets and their trajectories in Universe. That they don’t have circular and static movement, but spiroidal and mobile. Is it possible that the planets within our solar system, those observed by the astronomers with telescopes, to have indeed the circular and enclosed movement observed by people of Earth because they are also a part of the décor made for this moment in which we are now? If they don’t have that movement, but a normal movement, like all planets, and considering that the astronomers calculate the speed and trajectory taking in account the position of the same planet in different moments in time in rapport with the sun, the next two questions occur: -The error is due to the fact that they make the rapport with the Sun and they should rapport to other celestial sphere, or should they rapport to more celestial spheres? -Or the error occurs due to the fact that in the respective points in fact is not always the same planet, but it alternates with the twin planets? Answer by Zoran Tiger: The planets have different movements. They, the planets, are so complex, than there is no way to know them. If today a planet is to the south, in another moment it is at the north, west, and many other directions which are not known on Earth. The planets are in permanent movement. No telescope, no matter how powerful it is, cannot see the planet but only as a pale image and no more. The planet has its movement, its rotation, its energy, the power to accumulate, of absorption, of rejection, of self purifying. A planet has so many, that a limited telescope, may it be very performing, cannot observe not even 0,1 % of a planet existence. The planets are connected between them and they rapport to the sun, also to distances, to the change in movement, to the change in rotation. The planets are part of the perpetuum, they rapport to the perpetuum, and the perpetuum is unlimited. The error of the so called scientists who are paid for nothing due tot the fact that they study the planets, comes out in their desire of studying the planets. You cannot study what you cannot touch, smell, see and many others. The error is when you try to study what you cannot study. If you cannot handle a problem, then do not study it! The scientist came to the correct conclusion on why is the cow getting fat. If you gave molasses to a cow, she gets fat and gives a lot of milk. When she gets fat, the fats begin to obstruct the udder and the milk producing channels are closed. The only solution is to remove the molasses. If you remove the molasses, the cow loose weight and stops giving a lot of milk. The scientists should solve this problem, namely: to handle well the problem of how should the cow remain to an acceptable weight to give a lot of milk without being distempered. Before taking the telescope to study the planets, they should solve the problems with the cow!
Posted on: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 14:23:21 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015