RE: CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE ON LIABILITY TO THE HIGHWAY TRAFFIC ACT-DEMAND FOR PROOF(S) OF CLAIM--I.E., EVIDENCE OF THE REQUIREMENT OF LICENSING AND REGISTRATION OF A PRIVATE CONVEYANCE D E M A N D F O R P R O O F O F C L A I M Dear: i grew up being told by my parents and other members of the community that all MOTOR VEHICLES and MOTOR CARRIERS must be registered and operators of motor vehicles must apply for a license to “drive”. i have since learned that is not true according to law. (cases too numerous to bother mentioning here.) i have canceled the licence due to this deception and fraud and to rectify and clarify that i am not employed by the Crown nor do i act as an agent of the government in any capacity. Now to be fair and to act with care i believe i must DEMAND you prove otherwise. i have identified the statutory construct as an imminent threat and injurious to me and i have withdrawn my consent to be a member of the statutory society. i live according to the Common Natural and Inherent Laws and i shall not submit to attempts of exploitation by public or private officials in their practices of compelled compliance through threats, violence,deliberate misinformation,coercion and un due influence. i also reserve my rights and do not consent to the jurisdiction of your courts of equity and admiralty procedure as i deem them to be corrupted. Thus, i Conditionally Accept the alleged obligations imposed by Ontario and The Highway Traffic Act if you can prove to me that my declaration of withdrawal of consent from the statutory construct of commercial codes and commercial administrative courts can be lawfully ignored and held in contempt by public or private officials or agents of the Crown even though, as often as not, the statutes and acts are contrary to natural law. This agreement is also dependent upon proof so certain that the specific statutes and acts are applicable to me in the pursuit of my Private Life and Business, in my private conveyance. i hold that the Highway Traffic Act in Ontario does not pertain to me as a private man, engaged in my private life and business: Therefore your Proof (s) of Claim are demanded to validate any claim that the Crown may have that there is indeed a requirement that the private conveyances, commonly known and referred to as automobiles, be licensed and registered as Passenger Vehicles in Ontario, and that i as a living soul must submit to the conversion of my RIGHT to TRAVEL into a privilege. It is also clear that since all police officers and most “public officials” are, in fact, “private entities”, by what authority do the municipal corporations’ police personnel arrest a traveler in order to enforce a Statute- The Highway Traffic Act ? When these private policy enforcers (police) try to gain a security interest and issue a Provincial Offences Ticket related to motor vehicles, it is a “Traffic Ticket”. Further, TRAFFIC is defined in my Black’s Law Dictionary as “Trade. Commerce. The exchange of goods for the equivalent in goods or money.” The Traffic Tickets, therefore, can only apply to PERSONS engaged in “Traffic”. And I know that the vast majority of such Tickets do not comport with this definition. To save you time, i have provided a stipulated answer for you, in underlined italics, to each Demanded Proof of Claim: If my answer is correct, then you have no obligation to answer. However, if you find my position in error and the stipulated answer is incorrect, then you have an obligation to provide your own Proof (s) of Claim and/or answer point-for-point for the record within Ten (10) days. To constitute an answer/response, you are demanded to Provide Proof (s) of Claim as listed below: 1) PROOF OF CLAIM, that the Crown in Right of Ontario has any authority to compel a private man into participation into a commercial activity/contract, or to surrender his private interest/ownership to the public police powers of Ontario. Stipulated answer: The Crown in Right of Ontario has no authority to compel a private man to contract with any corporation. 2) PROOF OF CLAIM, that the Undersigneds privately-held Bill of Sale does not constitute lawful title to the property named (a private conveyance/automobile). Stipulated answer: A privately-held Bill of Sale does constitute lawful title. 3) PROOF OF CLAIM, that the Crown in Right of Ontario can produce evidence of a claim of title/security interest to a conveyance (automobile), which is superior to a private Bill of Sale. Stipulated answer: The Crown in Right of Ontario can produce no superior claim or title. 4) PROOF OF CLAIM, that the Crown in Right of Ontario, in light of the above Proof (s) of Claim, has a legal interest in a private conveyance (automobile) used by a Private Man as transportation in the pursuit of his Private Life and Business. Stipulated answer: The Crown in Right of Ontario has no legal interest in such a conveyance (automobile). 5) PROOF OF CLAIM, that The Crown in Right of Ontario authorizes private police or government police employees to arrest travelers on the common way,arbitrarily taking away right of use for any reason which said employees allege to have probable cause. Stipulated answer: The Crown in Right of Ontario has not authorized private police to arrest travelers on the common way arbitrarily talking away right of use for any reason when the private officer alleges probable cause. 6) PROOF OF CLAIM, that The Crown in Right of Ontario authorizes private employees,police,bylaw officers or government police to compel contract via vehicle registration or face any combination of delay, inconvenience, detention, the arbitrary seizure of their private property to be held for fee until such registration is acquired. Stipulated answer: The Crown in Right of Ontario does not authorize public or private employees to compel contract through vehicle registration. 7) PROOF OF CLAIM, that The Crown in Right of Ontario authorizes public or private employees or agents to compel contract by demanding a traveler present a valid (unexpired) driver license and possession of a driver license. Stipulated answer: The Crown in Right of Ontario does NOT authorize public or private employees or agents to compel contract by demanding a traveler present a valid driver license or face the possibility of fines, detention, the arbitrary seizing of private property. Due to violent attacks by police already and the prevalent attitude of public law enforcement officers in this Province to stop, detain, threaten, harass, cite, and unlawfully take the property of a Private Man engaged in his Private Life and Business, while traveling in his private conveyance, it is imperative that you answer the Proof (s) of Claim listed above within Ten (10) days. Should you demure, my claim stands and this document establishes your tacit agreement to the above, that this Conditional Acceptance for Value becomes the Security Agreement between the parties, and that you, as The Crown in Right of Ontario, loose any defense on the issue of registration or application of the Highway Traffic Act upon the Undersigned by estoppel in any jurisdiction of the Crown and you agree that any traffic stop by any officer at any level within this Province for said registration issue and others emanating from said stop establishes misfeasance of the statute and fraud with damages at not less than fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) per incident and that The Crown becomes a judgment debtor to the Undersigned under necessity. NOTICE: All previous interactions/contracts made under The Highway Traffic Act with police and myself are deemed to have been entered into fraudulently as a direct result of deliberate disinformation on your part and are considered to be null and void as i have never been employed, in the capacity of AGENT, by the government and /or performed a function of government at the time of any information, nor does any proof /evidence exist that i have ever received payment or compensation for performance in that capacity. Further, you will have agreed that the private man is not subject to The Highway Traffic Act and that the Undersigned has a right to travel in his private conveyance in private use of same and that said private conveyance(s) of the Undersigned are EXEMPT from the regulations of such statutes/acts and said private conveyance(s) are outside of The Highway Traffic Act for registration.’ Thanking you in advance for your time in this most urgent matter. Sole Authorized Administrator .................................................. RESTRICTED USE, RESTRICTED CAPACITY, All Rights Reserved.
Posted on: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 23:08:52 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015