Rationalize Kinetic Energy and Presence Energy Theories by: Miles Pelton The Kinetic energy theory of matter has been accepted unproven as a fundamental principle of Physics. The kinetic energy theory forms the basis for the unproven Conservation of Energy Law that has been adopted as the first law of Physics. The principles embodied in the kinetic energy theory and the conservation of energy law proclaim that if or when a system such as an atom or the sun is considered an isolated system, the system will function forever (eternally) without the introduction of energy from an outside source. In other words, perpetual energy/motion. Not only are the theories upon which based unproven, no system such as an atom or a sun can exist in the Universe as an isolated system except hypothetically. It can be argued that the universe itself is an isolated system. Further: neither the source of energy that powers the motion that produces Kinetic energy, nor the source of the particles themselves is explained, nor how kinetic energy produces the absolute, the fundamental force of gravity. Fundamental Physics recognizes that the presence of the mass of fundamental particles that make up the Universe constitutes a massive presence that was spread ubiquitously to fill the space that become the universe. Fundamental Physics recognizes (as has been proven and accepted as the principle underlying electrical energy) that: when considering a mass of like particles that are like charged (electrons for example) establishes a difference of charge potential between two points spanning a quantity of like particles with like charge. That difference of potential constitutes a source of energy which is sustained constant as long as the particles and the charge are sustained. Therefore: the energy that gives fundamental particles the power to attract another fundamental particle is inherent in each fundamental particle and an assembly of fundamental particles develops a power intensity as a center of gravity, equal to the number of fundamental particles in the assembly. The Fundamental Physics explanation of those processes fundamental to physics and creation provides self-evident proof of all requisites for the creation of a building block with the absolute behavior required to build the Universe. The current Physics explanation provides no proof of any of the requisites needed of a viable building block with behavior even reasonably close to that required of a building block with which to build the Universe. Applying a priori reasoning (common sense logic), is there any justification for continuing to deny consideration of the Fundamental Physics explanation?
Posted on: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 11:20:30 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015