Re: Why arent the ELITE raw vegan? Posted by: The Sproutarian Man () Date: January 04, 2015 03:23PM THeSt0rm Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > its interesting, that Arthur Cristian says the > name is the mark of the beast. That is exactly what it is, the `name marks the fiction we live under for enslavement into the system. Not just a first name, but an all capital letters name with a corporate fiction title of Mr/Mrs/Ms seals the deal. If you dont have that name the system cant process you in their system. If you have the name you are a mere trustee and the system is the beneficiary (they launder money) who can appoint themselves Administrator under the Coat of Arms corporate name, that is why the police and judge can do whatever they want to you despite their their laws being unlawful, because your parents signed you up the the birth certificate where they waved all your rights of freedom. Trustees of the cestie Que Vie trust must do as they are told. Now...eventhough the system did not divulge all terms and conditions of the contract, it doesnt matter because it is a corrupt system and all judges will ignore the law UNTIL you spend many years in the High Court like my buddy Wayne bringing up over 25,000 pages of paperwork and over 1,000 pieces of case law to trap them. But to do it this way you need to devote every part of your life for the next 30 years to be able to beat them. Better to use the definition of money against them, much easier. [youtube] An aquaintance of mine Wayne Glew even said the Judge admitted to him the scam of the name. All the trillions of tax payers dollars have been laundered via the name in o/s bank accounts over decades. Wayne has personally seen 6 trillion Australian dollars in three seperate bank accounts under the Coat Of Arms accounts tucked away in Deleware. So who pays for roads etc, the system uses our name that is registered as a corporate account on the stock market to generate the money, and l suspect this stock market is fixed in their favour. > > Do you think Coat of ARms have any significance? Yes! The Coat of Arms tells us that we are the property of the corporate machine of which we are dead people with no rights. In Australia the COA has no royal assent, and ALL laws in the last 35 years are invalid under the Letter Patent 1900. I brought up this point and the local government let me park where ever l wanted under threat of millions in fines. What eventually happens is that you get threats from the system. The problem is that we can use the law to win cases, but it takes many years for victory in the High Court. It is better to understand money and to negotiate, but they stillfight you all the way. They fined me and l said that l will negotiate a price to pay, so instead of $300 l said l will pay $1 and lose NO points off my licence and marked the fine/contract not negotiable and they accepted it. See...if a fine is not marked not negotiable we can negotiate a price and conditions of the contract, but we must be able to do it properly. But once again they are testing me out and threatening to take my property, but when police show up l show them my contract and receipts and call the federal police and have them thrown lawfully off my property and tell them to take me to court. When it is done enough times they know you will always beat them, so they give up and leave you alone. Actually, l still park on the streets with no fines anymore because they know l will end up bankrupting the council and CEO, lawyer and infringements officer if they use fake laws to fine me. thesproutarian
Posted on: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 22:51:47 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015