Reactions to LIVELAW COVER STORY against SC jt which mandates Sanction for filing complaint against Public Servant Dear Mr.Rashid It was very heartening to read your article on the Anil Kumar judgment. The rot first started at the Karnataka High Court in a petition filed by Mr.B.V.Acharya, a good man who had been directed to be investigated in a bad case. I have since been publicly condemning that judgment and its successors that finally led to the Anil Kumar fiasco. Absurd and mindless are the words that I have used to describe those judgments in the media. Review Aiyappa ruling: Advocates - The New Indian Express newindianexpress/cities/bengaluru/.../article1817776.ece1 Oct 4, 2013 - Senior Supreme Court counsel K V Dhananjay told Express that the initiative was taken since the only force that was still keeping corruption in ... High Court judge recuses from hearing petitions filed by Nice deccanherald › State Mar 27, 2013 - “It would be legally absurd to hold that sanction is required even for the... the principal submissions of his counsel K V Dhananjay to the Court, ... I would just like to suggest, in public interest, that livelaw facilitate a collaborative effort for advocates across India to combine together so that they could collectively file a curative petition in the Supreme Court asking it to explicitly over-rule Anil Kumar judgment. A collaborative effort would cost nothing and advocates of learning, eminence, scholarship or concern could simply come together and file a curative petition at the Supreme Court - through facilitation by livelaw.in. All the necessary background materials to challenge it are already there in your own article. I too have a good barrage to challenge it. Read the Story here livelaw.in/sanction-referring-complaint-public-servantfor-investigation-s-1563-crpc-anil-kumars-case-201310-scc-705-per-incurium-need-not-followed/
Posted on: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 04:42:56 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015