Read this text (by I support NaMo) and see how sensible writing this is: I was also trying to argue the same thing that a great man can be followed and appreciated by anybody. So if Congis and their followers think that freedom fighters are their properties, or Patel is their properties as Patel was a Cong man, then it is the cheap act like some illiterate idiots do. Congis are cheap nodoubt. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The legacy of the great national leaders is not the property of a single political party. The Indian National Congress ,pre-independence was a vehicle in which people of many political hues participated in their quest for freedom. The legacy of those leaders belong to the entire nation and not to one political party. It is for this reason that Mahatma Gandhi resolved to disband the Congress after Independence. Mahatma Gandhi wrote ” Though split into two, India having attained political independence through means provided by the Indian National Congress, the Congress in its present shape and form, i.e., as a propaganda vehicle and parliamentary machine, has outlived its use. India has still to attain social, moral and economic independence in terms of its seven hundred thousand villages as distinguished from its cities and towns. The struggle for the ascendancy of civil over military power is bound to take place in India’s progress towards its democratic goal. It must be kept out of unhealthy competition with political parties and communal bodies. For these and other similar reasons, the A. I. C .C. resolves to disband the existing Congress organization and flower into a Lok Sevak Sangh under the following rules, with power to alter them as occasion may demand.(*Gandhiji’s idea of a transformed Congress was published in Harijan under the title “His Last Will and Testament”. Also published in ‘The Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi – Volume 90′, published by the Union Ministry of Information and Broadcasting’s publication division in 1984. Can the Congress leaders explain why Mahatma Gandhi who as per them is the sole architect of freedom was completly ignored in this essential point ? Does it not show the power-hungry nature of Nehru and his ilk ?
Posted on: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 06:23:57 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015