Refusal of Offer to Contract and Doc# 2014- 019780-0 REBUT of unlawful & Fraudulant 12/29/2014 District 401 Fairbanks Document #4FA-14-02336C Affiant - Creditor Trapper Killsmany v Respondents – Debtors- Tortfeasers as listed in documents; (Recording district:401 Fairbanks) #2014-002999-0, #2014-003808-0, #2014-002998-0 (When recorded return to: ) #2014-003000-0, #2014-003001-0 (Trapper Killsmany c/o ) Recorded in Recording District: 401- Fairbanks, Ak. (address ) (*Lien Docs include unrebutted Affidavit of Truths). (city, state [zip] ) *Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent: Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal.* I, the Affiant - Creditor, am NOT a Legal Fiction Person (as defined in a Law Dictionary) “TRAPPER KILLSMANY” as being a Corporate Entity (incorporated or non-incorporated) or some other kind of Partnership, BUT INSTEAD a living breathing, sovereign, flesh and blood Human Being with a living soul, with a distinct Mind that is capable of possessing personal knowledge commonly called Trapper Killsmany: (of the family Killsmany, when necessary to distinguish my Clan). This is yet another “Refusal of offer to contract” concerning fraudulent cases #4FA-14-02336CI, #4FA-14-02337CI & # 3:14-cv-00140-HRH. All pleadings must be done with the Common Law Court of Record. See Document # 2014-013013-0 Recorded 9-11-2014 in District 401 Fairbanks Alaska. Any other filings not consented to by Court of record are Fraudulent & unlawful. Concerning fraudulent filing received 12-15-2014 Stating essence of Debtors case # 4FA-14-02336CI & 4FA-14-02337CI is nonconsensual common law liens & the performance of duties as public servants. Neither of these arguments have any supporting evidence! These private contracts & liens in Common Law are nonjuducial & no Judge or Court may make any rulings or decisions on these liens. The liens went uncontested for over three months after recording & by law are matured liens. The ONLY way to change or eliminate these liens are before a Common Law Grand Jury of 12 sovereign citizens & each & every point in my Affidavit of Truth must be rebutted with documented evidence. That option has expired though & so the only other option is to settle with Creditor. Any other filing of anything not an offer is another Color of Law violation & more frauds on the court. (see statues & rulings below). Example of blatant Fraud are documents in Fraudulent case # 3:14-cv-00140-HRH done in secret meetings despite my recorded rebuttal & denied consent that was ignored thus proving more Fraud on the Courts. This unlawful Default decision has zero lawful or legal value other than to prove Fraudulent filings against my Lawfully recorded liens & other documents that support them. This & other fraudulent filings are just more pieces of evidence proving that my rights to Justice & other Constitutional Rights are being infringed & denied & to protect the criminal & unconstitutional activities of the many public servants listed in my documents. Jurisdiction is in Common Law & cannot be changed to your secret Jurisdiction without my consent. I have not given my consent & remain the Court of Record as my unrebutted document states. “We (judges) have no more right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given, than to usurp that which is not given. The one or the other would be treason to the Constitution.” — Cohen v. Virginia, (1821), 6 Wheat. 264 and U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200. Pg. 1 of 9 Rebut to II. Facts in fraudulent motion for summary judgment: The unlawful Default Judgment in case # 3:14-cv-00140-HRH was done in secret & fraudulent. Just another attempt like this one to silence the Truth & suppress Justice. Nowhere in my documents did I mention Food Stamps. I had won that decision before the troubles started & is a pure lie. My grievance was the unlawful lies in order to financially break me which they did & the unlawful slander & accusations made by the public servants in a secret document called “Blue Flagged”, That I was not made aware of till years later & seems to be the bases for all the rest of these fabricated claims & attacks & Slander against me. It is a document still held in secret & what I have seen of it is pure fabricated lies told by a mentally ill person. See the letters & statements of David Anderson telling outright lies about me like twisting my document dates around to cut me off & break me which it did & is still hurting me. Virginia, Missouri & Arizona all accepted my documents as I was in compliance. Only a few weeks after my meeting in Arizona does David Anderson & gal at FPA collude against me with the “Blue Flag” document & report me & their fabricated Slanderous story to police thus starting the chain of unlawful attacks against me in secret & I had no idea of how to fight back against fabricated secret accusations. The Restraining order was done using pure lies from a divorce 25 years earlier (at that time I was secretly working undercover with a narcotics task force) & Fraud in an Extortion scam & to get me out of my house so I could be robbed & to get out of the moneys owed to me & my dad. I was denied any Due Process as I was denied the right to present evidence or speak. To date there has not been one piece of evidence presented by any court or official other than Rumors, hearsay & outright lies about me just like in the recent unlawful Slandering of me in Papers & Media Nationwide with pure lies about me told by the U.S. & Alaska Attorney Generals in July 2014. This was a fraudulent act to discredit my lawful liens because they have zero evidence to rebut my Affidavits of Truth that are still unrebutted & stand as the Truth in Law. (A) First the contracts in Common Law were agreed to & consented to twice by everyone listed. Once with the original document & second opportunity given with the Notice of Default. At no time & continuing to this very day, apox one year later there has been not one rebut to my Affidavit of Truth or any other documents. Therefore by law it stands as truth! These liens are on private contracts & Constitutional & not part of any Sovereign movement! They are the only means to Justice when denied access to the courts as I was because I have no money. They are founded on Truth & Documented Facts! All Debtors received copies of all documents by certified mail & were given triple time allowed by law to rebut twice (see Notice of Default documents).They were served at their place of employment as that was & is the only address to date provided & serves as lawful notice. All refused to identify themselves & provide information requested in the PSQ forms sent out twice. (B)I did make efforts to go through the courts first, but was refused because I have no money. I called every attorney listed in Alaska & none would help without tens of thousands of dollars up front & all said the Alaska courts & Troopers etc were too corrupt. Seeking Justice should be the concern here instead of making up more lies about me. These liens are a nonjudicial process as stated in the documents & do not require a courts permission as they are based on Truth & the Documented Facts. Unlike the Fabricated & undocumented lies told about me. I even sent in Petitions with over 800 (even after losing 90% from being hacked 3 times) signatures & character references as Alaska Allows, but even those went ignored like ALL my other requests for Justice. Alaska R.App.P. 23(c)(1) allows the filing of a petition for review when an order affects a substantial right which “in effect terminates the proceeding or action and prevents a final judgment therein Alaska R.App. P. 23 (d) permits the filing of a petition for review when a controlling question of law is involved. Pg. 2 of 9 (C)Second there is no protection in law for criminal & treasonous activities while employed as public servants. By slandering my good name & committing frauds they have given up any rights. It is not their duty & confers no rights to commit crimes & attack people simply because they dont like their name or how they look. I was also denied my Due Process rights at every stage of these Gang Stalking crimes. I have never been allowed to speak or show evidence in any of these fraudulent courts in Alaska. All because I had no money for a BAR member to talk for me. Clear violation of my Rights! I have proven that I have never at any time done any harm to anyone & I have not broken any laws! The ONLY evidence shown to date are hearsay, rumors & slander with no facts to back them. To date I have never been shown any evidence to show where I have done anything to anyone or what laws I am suppose to have broken. “Officers of the court have no immunity, when violating a Constitutional right, from liability, For they are deemed to know the law.” Owen v. Independence, 100 S.C.T. 1398, 445 US 622. 42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights “Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress.” Rev.Stat. § 1979, 42 U.S.C. § 1983. These so called Public Servants have refused to fill out & return the PSQ documents sent twice. They have all refused to identify themselves & state the Nature & Cause of their unlawful actions against me. Therefore ALL authority has been surrendered. They also have not been able to produce their bonds & therefor are not lawfully employed. Failure to fill out & return PSQ forms is a violation of The Privacy Act of 1974 mandates and requires government employees, private contractors, agents and representatives, identify themselves and disclose certain information regarding their rank, commission, or appointment before interacting with a private citizen, and must present proof of personal identification and bonding information or insurance when requested. It is also an Obstruction of Justice crime. Alaska Stat. § 39.15.100. : Alaska Statutes - Section 39.15.100.: Failure to file new bond. (a) If a state officer or employee fails to file a new bond within 15 days from the date of personal service or within 30 days from the date of the first insertion of a publication, the office becomes vacant and the officer or employee forfeits the office. (b) The office shall be filled as in other cases of vacancy. The person applying for release from liability on the bond is not liable on it after the office becomes vacant. Public Servants cannot be Sworn to a Constitutional Oath AND be a Member of the B.A.R. (British Accredidation Registry) Conflict of Interest between Contracts, Loyalites. Article 1 Section 10.1 Obligation of Contracts, Titles of Nobility Clause. Art. 2.01. DUTIES OF DISTRICT ATTORNEYS. Each district attorney shall represent the State in all criminal cases in the district courts of his district and in appeals there from, except in cases where he has been, before his election, employed adversely. When any criminal proceeding is had before an examining court in his district or before a judge upon habeas corpus, and he is notified of the same, and is at the time within his district, he shall represent the State therein, unless prevented by other official duties. It shall be the primary duty of all prosecuting attorneys, including any special prosecutors, not to convict, but to see that justice is done. They shall not suppress facts or secrete witnesses capable of establishing the innocence of the accused. Pg. 3 of 9 There is an oath of office that goes with becoming a prosecutor. Though it no doubt varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, it basically requires the prosecutor to faithfully execute his duties and to uphold the constitution of the state where he works and the Constitution of the United States of America. The obligation to do and seek justice is frequently included and that gives the prosecutor the duty to represent the interests of all the people, which includes those accused of crimes as well as the victims. It is different from any other job of a lawyer, in that a prosecutors duty is to justice as opposed to being focused on zealously advocating for a particular client. (listen to audio from Nov 2014 phone conversation). The Seventh Circuit of Appeals has held that a public official does not have immunity simply because he operates in a discretionary situation. It indicated that public servants are to be held liable when they abused their discretion or acted in a way that is arbitrary, fanciful, or clearly unreasonable. (Civil Rights) Littleton v. Berbling (1972, Ca. 7 Ill.), 468 F.2d 389.36.304-308 Governmental immunity is not defense in suits brought under this section making liable every person who under color or state law deprives another person of his civil rights. Westberry v. Fisher, DC Me., 1970, 309 F.Sup. 95.18 USC § 2381 - Treason | Title 18 241-242- Crimes and Criminal ...law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2381 State officers may be held personally liable for damages based upon actions taken in their official capacities. Hafer v. Melo, 502 U.S. 21 (1991). Purpose: Generally, this section further protects civil action for deprivation of rights protects constitutional rights from invasion by persons acting under state or federal authority. (Civil Rights) Weise v. Reisner, DC Wis. 1970, 318 F.Sup. 580, quoted from U.S.C.A. 1972 pocketpart, P. 40 Title 42, Sec. 1983, Note Paragraph 8,,,,,. An conspiracy is actionable under 42 USC 1985, when there has been an actual of denial of due process.(Civil Rights) Jennings v. Nester (1954, Ca. 7 Ill.) 217, F.2d 153, CERT DEN 349 U.S. 958, 99 L.Ed. 1281, 75 S.ct. 888.Thus, the particular phraseology of the constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written constitutions, that a law repugnant to the Constitution is void; and the courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument. Marbury v Madison, 5 US 1803 (2 Cranch) 137, 170?180, and NORTON v. SHELBY COUNTY, 118 U.S. 425. III. LEGAL STANDARD The Alaska Supreme Court has affirmed summary judgment where a party has provided only “naked assertions” or “meager statements unsupported by other evidence”. To date there has been no evidence shown by any of the Debtors other than lies, slander, hearsay, rumors & fabricated & Fraudulent filings of bogus statements. I have provided solid evidence in pictures, audios, witnesses with no financial interests & fabricated documents such as the fraudulent arrest warrant made up two days after unlawful arrest & 10 of unlawful detention & torture to force an unlawful plea bargain coerced under duress. As well as the unlawful breaking & entering into my home weeks after I was being unlawfully arrested without a warrant to steal my legal papers, steal my medical records & they stole my pictures off my cameras from the day of unlawful arrest. I have their own document (list) they left in my home when they were trying to fabricate evidence to cover their crimes. Pg. 4 of 9 IV.Argument & V. Conclusion My lawful liens & documents are not part of any Statuary process! They are in Common Law & based on Truth & Documented Facts. THAT the eternal, unchanged principles of Law are: A workman is worthy of his hire. All are equal under the Law. In Law, truth is sovereign. Truth is expressed in the form of an Affidavit. An unrebutted Affidavit stands as truth in Law. An unrebutted Affidavit becomes the judgment in Law. All matters must be expressed to be resolved. He who leaves the battlefield first loses by default. A lien or claim can be satisfied only through an Affidavit by a point-for-point rebuttal, resolution by Jury or payment. “The Common Law is the real law, the Supreme Law of the land. The codes, rules, regulations, policy and statutes are “not the law.”(Self v. Rhay, 61 Wn 2d 261), They are the law of government for internal regulation, not the law of man, in his separate but equal station and natural state, a sovereign foreign with respect to government generally.) With such overwhelming case law there is no question about the fact of the claim made here statutes are not law. Plaintiff/the court now challenges prosecution and Magistrate to prove the statutes apply to plaintiff/court. Plaintiff denies being a government employee if the prosecution or state or Magistrates wish to say different then prove I have been a paid employee of federal or state Government. As well article 1 section 8 clause 14 says clearly the government makes the rules for the government not the people. Cruden v. Neale, 2 N.C. 338 (1796) 2 S.E.] “It may be that it is the obnoxious thing in its mildest and least repulsive form; but illegitimate and unconstitutional practices get their first footing in that way, namely, by silent approaches and slight deviations from legal modes of procedure. This can only be obviated by adhering to the rule that constitutional provisions for the security of person and property should be liberally construed. A close and literal construction deprives them of half their efficacy, and leads to gradual depreciation of the right, as if it consisted more in sound than in substance, It is the duty of courts to be watchful of the constitutional rights of the citizen, and against any stealthy encroachments there on” A TRUE BILL OF INFORMATION UNDER COMMON LAW “It will be an evil day for American Liberty if the theory of a government outside supreme law finds lodgment in our constitutional jurisprudence. No higher duty rests upon this Court than to exert its full authority to prevent all violations of the principles of the Constitution.” [Downs v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901) ] Judges appointed by the state are Chancellors or Magistrates - they are the referee of the court. AT LAW. [Bouviers Law, 1856 Edition] This phrase is used to point out that a thing is to be done according to the course of the common law; it is distinguished from a proceeding in equity. PEOPLE. People are supreme, not the state. [Waring vs. the Mayor of Savanah, 60 Georgiaat 93]; The state cannot diminish rights of the people. [Hertado v. California, 100 US 516]; Preamble to the US and NY Constitutions - We the people ... do ordain and establish this Constitution...; ...at the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people; and they are truly the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects...with none to govern but themselves... [CHISHOLM v. GEORGIA (US) 2 Dall 419, 454, 1 L Ed 440, 455, 2 DALL (1793) pp471-472]: The people of this State, as the successors Pg. 5 of 9 of its former sovereign, are entitled to all the rights which formerly belonged to the King by his prerogative. [Lansing v. Smith, 4 Wend. 9 (N.Y.) (1829), 21 Am. Dec. 89 10C Const. Law Sec. 298; 18 C Em.Dom. Sec. 3, 228; 37 C Nav.Wat. Sec. 219; Nuls Sec. 167; 48 C Wharves Sec. 3, 7]. Oaths: Article VI: This Constitution, and the laws of the United States... shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every State shall be bound thereby; anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding... All executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by oath or affirmation to support this Constitution. See all documents sent in & recorded to support my statements. I have the solid documents & audios & pictures & eyewitnesses to back all of my statements also! These lawful documents & evidences have all gone ignored: Following unrebutted & Lawfully recorded in District 401 Fairbanks Alaska. Doc 2014-003001-0, liens, contracts & unrebutted Statement of Truths. Doc 2014-002159-0 Notice of Default & second chance to rebut. Doc 2014-003808-0, liens, contracts & unrebutted Statement of Truths. Doc 2014-003123-0 Notice of Default & second chance to rebut. Doc 2014-003000-0, liens, contracts & unrebutted Statement of Truths. Doc 2014-002162-0 Notice of Default & second chance to rebut. Doc 2014-002999-0, liens, contracts & unrebutted Statement of Truths. Doc 2014-002161-0 Notice of Default & second chance to rebut. Doc 2014-002998-0, liens, contracts & unrebutted Statement of Truths. Doc 2014-002160-0 Notice of Default & second chance to rebut. [Below is notice given in Notice of Default & second chance to rebut] YOU ARE HEREBY NOTICED that you are in default of an opportunity to respond to the COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT REGISTERED MAIL NUMBER- xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sent to you on (date) by certified mail. You were given the opportunity to rebut the claims made against you by your failure to answer said AFFIDAVIT. A DEFAULT JUDGEMENT is being sought against you having waived the right to answer by acquiesence, tacit admission and failure to contest, rejecting your due process opportunity. (See Randone v. Appellate Court, 5 C3d 536; Mullane v Central Hanover Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 314;Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp., 395 U.S. 337, 339; Melorich Builders v. Superior Court, 160 Cal App 3d 931, as in line with California Code of Civil Procedure § 437(c), defaults.) IN ABSENCE of such response, Affiant, Trapper Killsmany, hereby inserts and records this NOTICE OF DEFAULT upon and against above named Respondent(s). He/she can lawfully Command the honorable bargain of Just Compensation from the government (18 USC 241 & 242), WHEREAS such actions now shall be taken in accordance to the procedures set forth in the COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT defaulted. See also: Doc 2014-012489-0 Order to Cease all Fillings of Frivolous & Fraudulent Litigations etc. Doc 2014-010103-0 & 2014-010102-0 Notice of Fraudulent recordings & Amendment options to liens. Doc 2014-011162-0 Affidavit of Rebuttal & Order to Cease all Public Slander & all future filings of Frivolous Litigations in case # 3:14-cv-00140-HRH. Doc 2014-012003-0 Affidavit of Rebuttal & Order to Cease all Public Slander & all future filings of Frivolous Litigations in case # #4FA-14-02336CI. Doc 2014-018986-0 Evidence of Frauds by the Alaska Courts & US & State Attorney Generals & 0ther Public Servants including Judges & Prosecutors. Pg. 6 of 9 See also all previously sent rebuttals & notices. If anyone wishes to rebut my documents or argue any of the facts then it must be done lawfully & that is before a Common Law Grand Jury of 12 sovereign people in a State outside of Alaska as Alaskas courts have been proven to not honor the laws. Therefore Arizona will be the state as they share Federal jurisdiction with Alaska. I am open to settlement offers as my previous documents included. First & foremost is to clear my good name of these obviously bogus & fraudulent charges & return my stolen property & then to reimburse me for my losses from these unlawful attacks. Justice is the major concern here. If the U.S. Supreme Court acknowledged the authority of the common law Grand Jury (U.S. v. Williams), why would the state have authority to counter that opinion? The common law is superior to all statutory law, and we must only invoke it in the right way to have superior standing. We need to stop putting the common law and the Grand Juries underneath their inferior statutory laws. The people (singular AND plural) have the ultimate authority! (Rodriques v. Ray Donavan, U.S. Department of Labor, 769 F.2d 1344, 1348 (1985)); …lacking due process[of law], in that they are ‘void for ambiguity’ in their failure to specify the statutes’ applicability to ‘natural persons,’ otherwise depriving the same of fair notice, as their construction by definition of terms aptly identifies the applicability of such statutes to “artificial or fictional corporate entities or ‘persons’, creatures of statute, or those by contract employed as agents or representatives, departmental subdivisions, offices, officers, and property of the government, but not the ‘Natural Person’ or American citizen Immune from such jurisdiction of legalism. When a state, by and through its officials and agents, deprives a citizen of all of his remedies by the due process of law and deprives the citizen of the equal protection of the law, the state commits an act of mixed war against the citizen, and, by its behavior, the state declares war on the citizen. The citizen has the right to recognize this act by the publication of a solemn recognition of mixed war. This writing has the same force as the Declaration of Independence. It invokes the citizens U.S. constitutional 9th and 10th so-called amendment guarantees of the right to create an effective remedy where otherwise none exists. The truth is to be found in the Constitution for the United States of America at Article 1, Section 10, Clause 1, “No state shall pass any law impairing the Obligation of Contracts”. There are more U.S. Supreme Court rulings on this constitutional provision than any other. This is not at all surprising because it applies to all of the states and to the United States Government and to all nations of the world. It is the basis of world trade, and the reason the Constitution, as a binding international trade treaty, was written. Modification of Private Contracts: The Supreme Court laid out a three-part test for whether a law conforms with the Contract Clause in Energy Reserves Group v. Kansas Power & Light 459 U.S. 400 (1983). First, the state regulation must not substantially impair a contractual relationship. Second, the State must have a significant and legitimate purpose behind the regulation, such as the remedying of a broad and general social or economic problem. 459 U.S. at 411-13 Third, the law must be reasonable and appropriate for its intended purpose. This test is similar to rational basis review. Mitchell v. United States - No. 97-7541 Argued December 9, 1998 If someone makes a legal, or lawful, claim and it is not disputed, then the assertion is construed to be true. A Lien is defined as an Affidavit of Obligation of Contract. Legitimately established Liens, unchallenged during the first three months of their existence, are said to be default matured to the rank of an account receivable. Liens unchallenged for three years on the international money market are said to be seasoned three years, and a solid asset. Pg. 7 of 9 The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no duty to the state or to his neighbors to divulge his business, or to open his doors to an investigation, so far as it may tend to criminate him. He owes no such duty to the state, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such as existed by the law of the land long antecedent to the organization of the state, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. United States Supreme Court reminds us in Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 (1906): Liability in damages for unconstitutional or otherwise illegal conduct has the very desirable effect of deterring such conduct. Indeed, this was precisely the proposition upon which 42 USC section 1983 was enacted. Judges may be punished criminally for willful deprivations of constitutional right on the strength of 18 USC Section 241- 242. (Civil Rights) (Imbler vs Pachtman, U.S. 47 L.Ed. 2nd 128, 96 S.Ct.) This section was passed to enforce U.S.C.A. Constitution Amendment 14 and to protect form interference the rights secured thereby, as well as other constitutional rights; it is directed against conspiracies of private persons; and there is no requirement that conspiracy be under color of law. (Civil Rights) U.S.C.A. 1972 Pocket P. 1675, Title 42, Sec. 1995, Note 28.242-248. There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of Constitutional rights.- Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 945. To disregard Constitutional law, and to violate the same, creates a sure liability upon the one involved. 18 U.S. Code § 4 - Misprision of felony Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. “The State cannot diminish rights of the people.”- Hertado v. California, 110 U.S. 516. [SLANDER WITH SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES, CONSTITUTIONAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT] THAT I, the Affiant - Creditor, am NOT a Legal Fiction Person (as defined in a Law Dictionary) “TRAPPER KILLSMANY” as being a Corporate Entity (incorporated or non-incorporated) or some other kind of Partnership, BUT INSTEAD a living breathing, sovereign, flesh and blood Human Being with a living soul, with a distinct Mind that is capable of possessing personal knowledge commonly called Trapper Killsmany: (of the family Killsmany, when necessary to distinguish my Clan), have been Slandered by BOGUS cases [ see unrebutted Statements of Truth in documents 2014-003001-0, 2014-003808-0, 2014-003000-0, 2014-002999-0, 2014-002998-0 Lawfully recorded in District 401 Fairbanks, Alaska] in Violation of my Constitutionally Guaranteed Rights: Citizens Criminal Complaint Pursuant to 18 USC SECTION 4 Points of Law: U.S. Const. Article 1, SECTION 10; U.S. Const. Article IV, SECTION I;Amend. 1, 2, 5, 6, 9, 10, & 14; 18 USC SECTIONS 3, 4, 241, 242, 1001, 1621, 1622, 2071, & 2383;42 USC SECTION 1986; I seek Adequate REMEDY[as drawn from the Sovereign Persons Remedy for Default for SLANDER]: $500,000 per Active Criminal Index Slander, per day, per use of the name [TRAPPER KILLSMANY a Legal Fiction Person], for all bogus/fraudulent cases, as evidenced as a BOGUS/FRAUDULENT Pg. 8 of 9 charge by [evidence exhibits are unrebutted Statements of Truth & Slander in the Media], with 5% compound interest, compounded Daily, until REMEDY is satisfied, of [CALCULATED WITH INTEREST UNTIL FILING DATE $#], DUE AND PAYABLE NOW, which will be free of above specified daily compound interest accumulation of interest for a period of 30 (thirty) days from the date of the filing of this Affidavit, at which time said interest shall accumulate until the REMEDY of the Principle, with justified interest accumulation on hiatus in GOOD FAITH for 30 (thirty) days to justly adjudicate the matter. That the DEFENDANTS have Violated their Oath of Office documents, the Oath itself to uphold Constitutional Integrity, they are now employed in Conflict of Interest with the CONTRACT to Lawfully serve the people, creating a breach of CONTRACT in any continued employment which REQUIRES such an Oath. That they have performed criminal PERJURY under COLOR OF LAW for PROFIT on COMMERCIAL PAPER, and in CRIMINAL violation of their Oath to the Constitution of the United States of America, I demand that the DEFENDANTS carry the PERSONAL DEBT of the REMAINDER OF DEFAULT which their INSURANCE BONDS fail to pay; Please hold the DEFENDANTS criminally responsible TO THE FULLEST EXTENT OF THE LAW. In conclusion, my main concern is getting my name & record cleared of these fraudulent charges on my record now before I return to try & sell my house Im not allowed to live in if there is anything left with all the thieves up there. If anyone that is honest & interested in what is right & justice will read each my Affidavits Of Truth they will see the pattern to this Conspiracy Against my Rights & Gang Stalking. Everything done to me has been centered around my looks & my name which Ive had since 15 years old. I have not been told why I was & am being targeted & dont understand why with these fraudulent actions as I have never in my life done anything wrong or unlawful. Trooper Yancey said it was because he didnt like me & David Anderson has made it clear he hates anyone with native blood in so far as telling me I should go to my tribe for help & not him. ALL of my statements have hard evidence to back them & have been sent to the courts, but were ignored. Attached to the new unrebutted Affidavits of Truth (all statements are the same as in original unrebutted Notice & Demand documents) are just some of the documented evidence. I have boxes of it to back every word in the Affidavits of Truth & even more new evidence of more crimes being committed against me. Those attacking me are relying solely on hearsay, slander, rumors, frauds & fabricated lies about me with zero documented facts! Enclosed also find a Common Law Handbook. Acknowledgment SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me by Trapper Killsmany: known to me or proven to me to be the real human signing this Affidavit this day of December 15, 2014. By: __________________________________ Trapper Killsmany: in rerum natura ,standing on the land WITNESS my hand and official seal. (Seal) Signed and sealed this day of December 15, 2014. _______________________________ _______________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC [Print Name] Pg. 9 of 9
Posted on: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 17:59:06 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015