Replace “The ‘Few’/’Moderate’/’Not Islam’” policy paradigm with a “No Victim is the Price of a Cultures admittance to the Public Square.” policy paradigm or the Islamic/Muslim cultural terror and associated major schism with massive redirection of scarce resources better spent on education, health, infrastructure, … simply to protect citizens from a violent culture with a genocide construct of Other allowed to flourish in our Public Squares, continues. The ‘Few’/’Moderate’/’Not Islam’ policy paradigm has failed as it was destined to because it is based upon a lie Not Culture. Decision making theory would inform us what in time and space will happen eventually when utilizing a lie within a decision making process to inform outcomes? Let us examine the potential veracity of such statements of denial of attribution of a cultures creation of terror either by Other who take the culture adherents leaders word as valid despite the missing, burning buildings and broken bodies and lives. Let’s call them what they are, Obamas spokesman said on Tuesday. These terrorists are individuals who would like to cloak themselves in the veil of a particular religion. But based on the fact that the religious leaders of that religion have roundly condemned their actions, those religious leaders have indicated that their actions are entirely inconsistent with Islam, he said. Religion that dare not speak its name: British PM warns of global Islamist extremist terrorist threat while Americas president still wont mention Islam By FRANCESCA CHAMBERS FOR DAILYMAIL.COM PUBLISHED: 17 January 2015 dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2913798/Religion-dare-not-speak-British-PM-warns-global-Islamist-extremist-terrorist-threat-America-s-president-won-t-mention-Islam.html “the Germans (inclusive of the Nazi) that great unified people are looking for peace and see friendship with Britain as a basis for peace not only for themselves but for everyone else”. Norman Hillson “I speak of Germany”, London 1937 Tanzpalast Eden Trial: On November 22, 1930, an SA Rollkommando attacked a popular dance hall frequented predominantly by left-wing workers. The victims were members of a migrant workers association that was holding a meeting at the Tanzpalast Eden (Eden Dance Palace) in Berlin. Three people were killed and 20 injured in an attack that was planned in advance.)” Hans Litten: From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Hans Achim Litten in cross-examined Hitler 1931 in a court case involving two workers stabbed by four Brownshirts (paramilitary wing of the Nazi Party). Litten understood clearly in his interrogation words and sentences are not written in foundation codex for no reason they are to inform ethics driving actions of adherents. Excerpts from the trial[edit]Litten: (...) Did you know that in the circles of the SA there is talk of a special rollkommando? Hitler: I havent heard anything about a rollkommando. (...) Litten: You said that there will be no violent acts on the part of the National Socialist Party. Didnt Goebbels create the slogan, one must pound the adversary to a pulp? Hitler: This is to be understood as one must dispatch and destroy opposing organizations. (...) (The presiding judge read a question formulated by Litten): Did Hitler, as he named Goebbels Reich Minister of Propaganda, know of the passage from his book, where Goebbels declares that fear of the coup détat cannot be permitted, that parliament should be blown up and the government hunted to hell and where the call to revolution was made again, letter-spaced? Hitler: I can no longer testify under oath, if I knew Goebbels book at the time. The theme (...) is absolutely of no account to the Party, as the booklet doesnt bear the Party emblem and is also not officially sanctioned by the Party. (...) Obama and those who support his view firstly need to explain if Not-Islam given the following is true as social psychology determines Cultures justify and authorise terror the individual adherent few as individuals and in groups deliver it. which culture is informing the terrorists behavior given terrorism is a political act necessarily requiring a culture to frame such behavior? Importantly has Obama and those who support his view found the theme of justification and authorisation for the terror against Other is absolutely of no account to the Party (Islam) , as the booklet (Quran) doesnt bear the Party (Islamic) emblem and is also not officially sanctioned by the Party (Islamic/Muslim culture). (...)? Is there nowhere in the Islamic text, in particular the core Islamic textual codex the Quran where justification and authorisation for the murder of Other exists to enable the terror against Other to occur and determines the claims by these religious leaders no violent acts on the part of the National Socialist Party (Islamic/Muslim culture) it is Not-Islam as valid? Let’s check: Have I sinned? What is a Genocide Construct of Other and Why it is formed? citizensfirstasnau.blogspot.au/2014/03/what-is-genocide-construct-of-other-and.html Replace “The ‘Few’/’Moderate’/’Not Islam’” policy paradigm with a “No Victim is the Price of a Cultures admittance to the Public Square.” Policy paradigm Or the Islamic/Muslim cultural terror and associated major schism with massive redirection of scarce resources better spent on education, health, infrastructure, … simply to protect citizens from a violent culture allowed to flourish in our Public Squares, continues.
Posted on: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 23:23:18 +0000