Rumors are racing through the physics and cosmology communities this weekend that long-sought, Nobel Prize-worthy evidence for cosmic inflation driving the Big Bang will be announced on Monday. A press conference for an unspecified major discovery is scheduled for noon EDT (16:00 UT) at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, just up the street from Sky & Telescope. Well be there. Word of what may be announced first broke into wide circulation late Friday night, when The Guardian newspaper in the U.K. published an article online, Gravitational waves: have US scientists heard echoes of the big bang? Excerpts: There is intense speculation among cosmologists that a US team is on the verge of confirming they have detected primordial gravitational waves – an echo of the big bang in which the universe came into existence 14bn years ago... that would change the face of cosmology and particle physics. If they do announce primordial gravitational waves on Monday, I will take a huge amount of convincing, said Hiranya Peiris, a cosmologist from University College London. But if they do have a robust detection … Jesus, wow! Ill be taking next week off. The discovery of gravitational waves from the big bang would offer scientists their first glimpse of how the universe was born. The signal is rumoured to have been found by a specialised telescope called Bicep (Background Imaging of Cosmic Extragalactic Polarization) at the south pole. It scans the sky at microwave frequencies, where it picks up the fossil energy from the big bang. For decades, cosmologists have thought that the signature of primordial gravitational waves could be imprinted on this radiation. Its been called the Holy Grail of cosmology, says Peiris, It would be a real major, major, major discovery.... The primordial gravitational waves have long been thought to be the smoking gun of inflation. Its as close to a proof of that theory as you are going to get. This is because cosmologists believe only inflation can amplify the primordial gravitational waves into a detectable signal. ...This is the real big tick-box that we have been waiting for. It will tell us something incredibly fundamental about what was happening when the universe was 10–34 seconds old, said Prof Andrew Jaffe, a cosmologist from Imperial College, London, who works on another telescope involved in the search called Polarbear.... In last Octobers Sky & Telescope we published an article on the race among several projects to find inflationary B-modes, and how this subtle signal would be formed in the first 10–34 second of the Big Bang. Here it is for background: Back to the Big Bang: A faint signal hidden in the universes earliest light might reveal what happened in the first moment of cosmic birth (2 MB pdf file). Here is our list of B-mode projects, with links to all. A summary of the topic and what to look for in an announcement comes from Philip Gibbs in his viXra log blog: Primordial Gravitational Waves? Excerpts: ...If true this would be a very big deal indeed because it could be a direct experimental hook into the physics of inflation and even quantum gravity. These are of course the least well understood and most exciting unchartered waters of fundamental physics.... Microwave polarisation can be broken down into two modes using a Helmholtz decomposition which splits a vector field into a sum of two parts: The E-mode whose vector curl is zero, and the B-mode whose divergence is zero. The E-mode in the CMB was first observed in 2002 by the DASI interferometer, but it is not particularly interesting. E-mode polarisation is generated by scattering from atoms before the radiation decoupled from matter but long after the period of inflation. Last summer the South Pole Telescope (SPT) found B-modes in the CMB for the first time, but these were known to be due to gravitational lensing of the radiation around massive galactic clusters. These can twist the E-mode polarisation to form B-modes so they are only slightly more interesting than the E-modes themselves. Really these lensing B-modes are not much better than a background that needs to be subtracted to see the more interesting B-modes that may be the signature of primordial gravitational waves. ...As an initial result, we are interested in [the strength of the inflationary B-modes], which is given by a parameter known simply as r. The latest rumors say that a value for r has been measured by the BICEP2 observatory in Antarctica.... Versions of the rumor say that the answer is r = 0.2. This is somewhat bigger than expected and could be as good as a 3 or 4-sigma signal because the sensitivity of BICEP2 was estimated at r = 0.06. If this is true it has immediate implications for inflationary models and quantum gravity. It would rule out quite a lot of theories while giving hope to others. For example you may hear a lot about axion monodromy inflation if this rumor is confirmed, but there will be many other ideas that could explain the result... Another implication of such a high value for r might be that primordial gravitational waves could have a bigger impact on galaxy formation than previously envisioned. This could help explain why galaxies formed so quickly and why there is more large scale structure than expected in galaxy distribution.... The most important thing about a high signal of primordial gravitational waves for now would be that it would show that there is something there that can be measured, so more efforts and funding are likely to be turned in that direction. But first the new result (if it is what the rumors say) will be scrutinised, not least by rival astronomers from the SPT and Polarbear observatories who only managed to detect lensing B-modes. Why would BICEP2 succeed where they failed?... Infinite implications? The inflationary theory of the Big Bang was worked out some 34 years ago to explain several paradoxes in todays universe. One was why very distant regions of space on opposite sides of the sky look similar even though they could have never have had any causal relation to each other in the original, simple Big Bang. Another was why the matter-and-energy density in the universe is so exquisitely balanced between the amount that would cause a quick recollapse (a Big Crunch) and a quick expansion away to practically nothing (the Big Chill). The inflation theory solved these problems, and then it succeeded even more spectacularly in a new way. It proved to explain the intractible mystery of the origin of cosmic structure, or the lumpiness of matter: how todays galaxies, galaxy clusters, and the overall cosmic web could have formed out of the extremely smooth Big Bang. Todays structures turned out to be explained almost perfectly by inflation rapidly expanding to cosmic size the microscopic, random quantum fluctuations that would be present in the dense matter before the first 10–34 second. So the inflation theory has become todays most accepted model of how the Big Bang happened. A more recent bit of evidence was the finding by the Planck mission that a slight tilt in the size distribution of the early fluctuations, an effect that the simplest version of inflation predicts, has clearly left its imprint on the cosmic microwave background radiation, which we see from a time 380,000 years after the Big Bang. But inflation makes wilder predictions as well. In its basic form it predicts that our spacetime is physically infinite, and is filled everywhere with stars and galaxies just about like those we see within our own cosmic horizon (out to just 13.8 billion light-years in terms of look-back distance). On an even grander scale, eternal inflation, which is now more or less the default model, predicts an infinite number of other Big Bang universes, separate from ours, continuing to erupt forever in an underlying matrix of the eternally inflating stuff that gave birth to ours. (The concept of this multiverse was dramatically visualized in last weeks Episode 1 of Cosmos.) Most other Big Bang universes might have very different physical properties from ours, expressing the vast number of different physical solutions to string theory as its presently conceived. Notes cosmologist Max Tegmark (MIT), Parallel universes are not a theory — theyre predictions of certain theories. And one of those theories, after Monday, may look a big step closer to being testable science that experimenters can get their hands into. Stay tuned. Posted By Alan MacRobert, March 16, 2014 related content: Cosmology
Posted on: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 19:09:45 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015