Scientists Are Not As Impartial As You Might Think. And Modern - TopicsExpress



          

Scientists Are Not As Impartial As You Might Think. And Modern Science Is Nothing But A Religion(Set Of Beliefs Followed Blindly. And World Of Frauds And Lies). They Are Biased. This Can Be Seen From One Example In Which Scientists Coined Term The Axis Of Evil. This Was Coined After Observational Data Didnt Fit With Their Big Bang Model And Other Models(Theories/Philosophies) That Universe Was Uniform And The Earth Had No Privilege(And Wasnt Center Or Near The Center Of The Universe). The Observational Data From Powerful And Precise(And Accurate As Much As They Could Make Them) Satellites Showed That The Universe Was NOT Uniform And It Showed That The Universe Seems To Have An Alignment That Points Directly To The Axis Of The Earth Across Its Equator. These Observational Evidences Invalidated The Big Bang Model And Other Models That These So Called Scientists Have Been Using As If They Were Facts. But Of Course, As In Any Other Organized Religion, Scientists Wouldnt Accept The Facts That Easily. This Observational Evidence(Not Assumption) That Suggested The Earth Was Center Or Near Center Of The Universe, Was Called As Evil. Here Is What They Have To Say About The Findings, It Is A Bit Technical(Or Not?) But You Get The Idea What Science And Scientists Are Up To, Lies And Frauds. Below Is From Article In New Scientist In September 2009. Notice The Phrase Terrorize Us, Yeah Truth Is Terror For Liars(In This Case Scientists And Modern Science): WHAT would you do if you found a mysterious and controversial pattern in the radiation left over from the big bang? In 2005, Kate Land and Joyo Magueijo at Imperial College London faced just such a conundrum. What they did next was a PR master stroke: they called their discovery the cosmic axis of evil. What exactly had they seen? Instead of finding hot and cold spots randomly spattered across the sky as they expected, the pairs analysis showed that the spots in the cosmic microwave background (CMB) appeared to be aligned in one particular direction through space. The apparent alignment is evil because it undermines what we thought we knew about the early universe. Modern cosmology is built on the assumption that the universe is essentially the same in whichever direction we look. If the cosmic radiation has a preferred direction, that assumption may have to go - along with our best theories about cosmic history. This disaster might be averted if we can show that the axis arises from some oddity in the way our telescopes and satellites observe the radiation. A nearby supercluster of galaxies could also save the day: its gravitational pull might be enough to distort the radiation into the anomalous form seen. Nobody knows for sure. We are dealing with the limits of our capabilities, says Michael Longo of the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor. All observations beyond our galaxy are obscured by the disc of the Milky Way, he points out, so we need to be careful how we interpret them. The European Space Agencys recently launched Planck space telescope might settle the issue when it makes the most sensitive maps yet of the CMB. Until then, the axis of evil continues to terrorise us. Then Scientists Say Things Like This: The fact that Planck has made such a significant detection of these anomalies erases any doubts about their reality; it can no longer be said that they are artefacts of the measurements. They are real and we have to look for a credible explanation, says Paolo Natoli of the University of Ferrara, Italy. Imagine investigating the foundations of a house and finding that parts of them are weak. You might not know whether the weaknesses will eventually topple the house, but youd probably start looking for ways to reinforce it pretty quickly all the same, adds Francois Bouchet of the Institut dAstrophysique de Paris. What Actually They Are Saying Is That They Cant Just Accept These Empirical Evidences So They Will Try To Band-Aid Their Theories With Some More THEORETICAL Physics And Mathematical Equations That Will Keep Their , Otherwise Failed Models, Standing Up And Going And Keep Lying To The Public About The Universe. And: Recently, the new release of the Planck observations on the CMB temperature anisotropy confirmed the alignment of the CMB quadrupole and octupole. And this particular direction is nearly aligned with CMB kinematic dipole direction. At the same time, the discontinuous distribution of power in the hemispheres on the sky was also been confirmed. All these show that we have the evidence for a break in isotropy. In order to solve these problems, a phenomenological dipole modulation may be needed. Since all these directional anomalies, as well as the alignment problems of the cosmic acceleration anisotropy discussed in this paper, the parity asymmetry of CMB power spectrum, the large-scale velocity flows and the large scale alignment in the QSO optical polarization data are connected with the CMB kinematic dipole and/or the ecliptic plane. Immediately After They Mention Possible Solutions To Explain These Deviations: We expect a single dipole modulation mechanism could solve all these puzzles. Several works have suggested that this kind of modulation could be caused by the non-trivial topology of the Universe, such as the anisotropic global Bianchi VIIh geometry, the Randers-Finsler geometry, or the multi-stream inflation. And Then They Say Things That Shows You How Arrogant They Are And How They Believe In Lies Despite Knowing The Truth: However, if they have the cosmological origin, it is very difficult to answer: Why the special direction is related to the current motion direction of the Earth, i.e. the CMB kinematic dipole. So, in our view, we would rather believe that these problems should be caused by some unsolved systematical errors in observations or data analysis Rather Than Accepting That Their Models Are Wrong They Will Believe Observational And Empirical Evidences Are Wrong, And Will Building New Science Upon That. It Is How Abu Jahal Was, He Knew The Truth. He Was Arrogant. P.S: Ignore Grammar Mistakes :P
Posted on: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 01:34:27 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015