Share.. R EC O M M E N D 4 N O B E L P E A C E P R I Z E . Share. SCI Bench Gopal Gowda -Vs- CJI Thakur, Thakur , Gopal Gowda Sites ILLEGAL - Judgment :- . . . . CJI Thakur, Thakur , Gopal Gowda Sites form part of sites formed in 37 acres Private Lands, forming part of JUDICIAL LAYOUT, NOT NOTIFIED, NO COMPENSATION PAID NOT acquired , NOT APPROVED by BDA land is invalid Addressing a bunch of petitions involving a common question of law, the Bench comprising of Justice V. Gopala Gowda and Justice C. Nagappan said, “we are of the view that physical possession of the land belonging to the appellants have neither been taken by the respondents nor compensation paid to them even though the award was passed on 06.08.2007, and more than five years have lapsed prior to date on which the Act of 2013 came into force. Therefore, the conditions mentioned in Section 24(2) of the Act of 2013 are satisfied in this case for allowing the plea of the appellants that the land acquisition proceedings are deemed to have lapsed in terms of Section 24(2) of the Act of 2013.” ............................ READ JUDGMENT & ARTICLE BELOW........... The Supreme Court of India delivered a judgment that is going to bring in relief to persons whose land has been acquired by the government and the government has not even started using the same despite years having gone by. Addressing a bunch of petitions involving a common question of law, the Bench comprising of Justice V. Gopala Gowda and Justice C. Nagappan said, “we are of the view that physical possession of the land belonging to the appellants have neither been taken by the respondents nor compensation paid to them even though the award was passed on 06.08.2007, and more than five years have lapsed prior to date on which the Act of 2013 came into force. Therefore, the conditions mentioned in Section 24(2) of the Act of 2013 are satisfied in this case for allowing the plea of the appellants that the land acquisition proceedings are deemed to have lapsed in terms of Section 24(2) of the Act of 2013.” The appeals in the Apex Court were filed by persons who continued to have possession of the land despite a notification was issued by the government regarding its acquisition. Importantly, the persons whose land was ‘acquired’ were not paid any compensation till date. In a similar instance, the Government of Maharashtra had acquired land which belonged to Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co, for laying of railway tracks in Vikhroli, Mumbai. However, even after ten years, the government took no steps to use the land but it changed the land use and made it to build a road. The change in land-use was challenged by Godrej, which claimed that the Government did not have the power to do so. However, the submission failed to find favour with the Bombay High Court and the petition was dismissed. This judgment will surely bring a sigh of relief to litigants who are battling it out against the Government in courts regarding the same issue. You may read more of Live Law’s coverage on Land Acquisition here. Read the Judgment here. JUDICIAL ILLEGAL Layout = FRAUD,FORGERY, LAND-GRABING 34 ACREs = Revenue Layout: NDTV: https://youtube/watch?v=DQQxwTyS0OU livelaw.in/governments-acquiring-land-not-using-invalid-supreme-court/ https://youtube/watch?v=TIiiyEj9qcA News X TV Video: “Judicial Layout Illegalities & Judge’s In-Eligibility & Criminal Culpability makes Karnataka Lokayukta Shivaraj Patil resign” = https://youtube/watch?v=rQQo0qU1qB0 Conspiracy of Judiciary & Ministers: Digvijay Mote to NDTV = https://youtube/watch?v=3n4T4nh7fV8 Need clean men in black robes: CJI = https://youtube/watch?v=LtSs1KBdo2Y&feature=fvwrel
Posted on: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 05:11:40 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015