Shia LaBeouf, I AM NOT FAMOUS ANYMORE - By Robin Lavance The instance of the occasion when it becomes alarmingly apparent, in particular a rising confrontation of viewpoints, as if an enclosure of thoughts has been hurled into unwilling corners to not be refuted further that are no longer able to permeate because of an unwillingness of dispersing intentions. As held back from and by an invisible restraint of willpower thus eluding to so many vicious multitudes of pestering whimsical bullheaded appeal that appeals to such a needed front of desired understanding. Resolved to seek clear understanding of what is to be of importance in a time where so many have decided with the help of others that who’s choice to be important is in the hands of “the decided” think it be deemed important to think it so. So it seems that all are important in a society where by and large that idea thrown out is most certainly not the case. All hold an important addition to society leaving those with the proclivity to do so empty handed jaded and left to resolve a blighted cause of alienation, but it is in this approach that one finds a way to separate from the others finds skills that differentiate them from the multitude of engraved crowds of steady streamers. To become lost to withdraw from the spotlight to seek refuge from all the harm afflicted may be a remedy for a moment, but the desire to continue on with the preservation of creativity to seek a standout role appreciated by others will always fester, and is very human and is very much needed especially in the field where one is subjected to the ridicule of others that is to write that all seek acceptance of some sort desire to be admired and respected, but with that comes a grave burden on the soul to be enamored in constant ridicule with also having a desire to please others leaves those in a vulnerable position for the rest of what may be a lifelong career. It is a role most deemed for those with superior qualities in doing such forms of performance work, having a keen sense of duty for the art and a desire to see “its” works flourish. How is one to survive a career when all have made it their own? And if it be possible to appreciate an art if the art is damaged deeply wounded not willingly by a willing crowd, but harnessed and manipulated so that those that have it lose it. Are those that take away admirers of the talent? Could it be possible that those that harness the skills to further alienate those that create jealous of the said ability, and if so what of it if those that be able to do so flourish at the given skill blessed upon them so dutifully. Can it not be said that those that harness the ability to create tools that the world adorns are vested to serve those that adorn? How can it be the other way around? If it is so that one is granted ability to adorn the creator of created tool than that individual alone can also do the same can he not? A person cannot be forced to adorn cannot be taught to adorn if it is not first there in the individual. To create not a tool but rather expand on the imagination of others can be adorned by more than those that allow the expansion of the imagination it is if not tremendously more important for those that create tools to be able to understand those that cannot if not to be able to represent but able to make better. It is a responsibility that is owed by those that have created and opened and expanded an imagination. For that is their talent. To take away is to take away from those that remain innocent to the ones that may be lost in the fray of so many others categorized as of being the same. The most responsibility lies in those with the most ability to make sure that all are better. A tremendous task that those of the ability most ardently take on without an ability to ignore it, yet it is how those that harness go about their means of resolving such issues each helping the other for as it seems one cannot hurt the other but help, as much may seem be the goal to hurt one another it ends that all are helped. The anger lies in those that do truly hurt that do truly inflict pain and to those that do not realize it because it is not of a permissible aptitude of comprehension. So it comes to point where one is guided by his interpretation of survival and how best to survive. The artist must live for his art nothing more, if the art is what he breathes, if it is what he is than he should be it and own it. Enemies will arise will persist, but the art should live on no matter the ridicule or whatever may come from what is created most important is to keep the creativity alive.
Posted on: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 04:46:36 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015