Should the most demanding target group require an explanation, people are not equal. Ones rights are subject to ones acts committed in the past - convicted criminal have relatively less rights than world class doctor who has saved human lives. Purpose of the work was to point out differences between different type of truths. Universal truth is ought to be true for everybody in a general level, such as mathematical truths. Statute books are often written in an universal language that does not rule out or mention singular cases, but set the guideline in a general level for interpretations. However, law is not considered as universal truth because of differences in language and culture. Despite the foundation of these subjective rules, they are considered as true as long as there is a social contract, which is called as practical truth. One is entitled to disagree with the law, not to take actions against it. In principle, gender equality as a general term is against moral perception mention above (prisoner-doctor) and is considered as existential truth from the point view of gynecologist or certain religious leaders whose profession is regulated by their religious books. Reason for this presentation was the way how certain individuals, groups and governments responded to my work, what is not an opinion, but an absolute truth in the context of majority vote, democracy. For instance, German Chancellor Angela Merkel informed publicly that work by which value of the Western worlds assets remained, was not Germans national interest. For this reason, respondent is not willing to negotiate with the Troika to raise capital, which is to fund my work that is much needed in the market.
Posted on: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 13:06:45 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015