Shudra’s real identity Since the term has been too controversial, causing irrepairable damage to the Indian society and have been used in deragotary manner, indicating lowest status of the largest population since long time, we need to have a look at the reality. The most importantly word ‘Shudra’ appears only in the hymn, Purusha Sukta, which otherwise is completely absent from Rig Veda. Many attempts have been made by various scholars to find the real meaning of the Shudras and who were they. The words Dasa, Dasyu were abundantly used in Rig Veda, as we have seen in the earlier chapters; in contempt for the residents of ancient Iran those practiced different faiths. But Purusha Sukta mentions, instead of Dasa-Dasyus, Shudras that, too, in a hymn that has been proved to be later composition. Suprisingly in later Vedic texts the term Dasa and Dasyus (equivalent to Iranian Daha, Dahyu), used in Vedas for the people, goes on vanishing and remains just as a suffix of the personal names. But while speaking of fourth section of the society, the people other than Vedics, the term Shudras have been applied, not Dasas or Dasyus. The sudden shift in the termilology, assigned for the class of the people clearly means that the Vedic had come across the new set of the people, i.e. Indian. This also is evident because, we should note here that, the term “Shudra” or its equivalent is not present in Avesta at all. What we find is Daha – Dahyu, quivalent to Dasa and Dasyus, in Avesta applied to the people of the land or compatriates. To Rig Veda they are the people those adhere to the different faiths and thus are enemies. It would appear the term Shudra has been emerged from nowhere which have no meaning whatsoever! This sure creates a problem for the proponents of Indigenous Aryan Theory as well. Also, let us not forget here that the term Shudra have no etymology, neither in so-called IE or Dravidian languages. R. K. Pruthi suggests that perhaps Shudra was originally the name of non-Aryan tribe. (Indian Caste System, edited by R.K. Pruthi, Discovery Publishing House, 2004, page 72) It may surprise us why then this tribe never came across the Vedic people to make its slightest mention in whole bulk of Rig Veda except for Purushsukta where suddenly it forms a major part of the society? The answer is clear. Vedic preachers had left far behind previous major communities known to them, such as Dasa, Dasyus etc. and had come across new lands and people. The later stray mentions of tropical seasons, plants, animals and technology in Rig Veda indicate none other than this. With the term Shudra, Vedic people meant those all the strangers they came across in Indian subcontinent and followed alien religious practices. Rajwade suggests that the people those were taken in the personal service by the victorious Aryans were called as Shudras. According to him, the term was later applied to those all who were out of three Varnas. (Radhamadhav Vilas Champu, Preface, Edited by Vi. Ka. Rajwade, Sarita Prakashan, reprint2014, page 130-31) Bhandarakar too suggests that the Shudras could be a tribe but afterwards came to signify anybody who was not a full-fledged Arya or a foreigner who has been partially assimilated by Arya culture. He further states that, from Sutras Shudra denotes a person other than the member of three Varnas, i.e. Brahmina, Kshatriya and Vaishya. (Some Aspects of Ancient Indian Culture, By D. R. Bhandarkar, 1989, page 12) Interestingly the term “Varna” for class too is new Vedic innovation because it is absent from Avestan scripts! If removed Aryan and replaced with Vedic, it will be clear from above opinions of the scholars that those all who were not Dasas or Dasyus or Vedics, those all lived in the Indian subcontinent, practiced different religion, were Shudras for the Vedic people. The fact is, though in Purushasukta, Shudra seemingly is enumerated as fourth class of Vedic religion; it was never at all the case. If we carefully read the RV 10.90.12, it makes clear that, the head of Purusha became Brahmin, hands became Kshatriya, and thighs became Vaishya….but Shudras were born of his feet. Feets didn’t become Shudra but were born of it. It indicates the distinction between Vedic and non-Vedics. The term only would apply to Indian people as Purushasukta is a very later composition that got inserted in Rig Veda that mentions Indian seasons and also uses the term Shudra first time and in the only verse. It could have been essential for the Vedics to name the people other than them or it was a term already in use to address the people of India. Those who were converted to Vedic religion and set in one of the three Varnas, authorized to Vedic recitals and ritualistic practices, were but naturally Vedics. Rest of the masses, following their traditional religion seems to have been named as Shudras. Or alternatively it could be a term used by Indians to address themselves from ancient times, but then the original term must have been phonetically quite different and Shudra was its corrupt Vedic form. It can be proved from one instance that Vedics in India pronounced corrupt form of the country name ‘Meluha’ as ‘Mlechchha’, which, later on lost its original meaning and became synonym of the people who spoke strange or foreign languages. (The Indus Civilization, by A. H. Dani and B. K. Thapar, page 274, available on https://en.unesco.org/silkroad/sites/silkroad/files/knowledge-bank-articlevol_I%20silk%20road_the%20indus%20civilization%20BIS.pdf) Same could have happened with “Shudra” which in later course of the time became a derogatory term; originally, it couldn’t have been the case. The fact is, we forget, Shudras were non-Vedic class, practicing idolatry from ancient times which was banned in the Vedic religion. Shudras were not authorized for Vedic rites or recitals because simply they didn’t need it for the sake of their own distinct religion they had preserved and still is practiced by the majority. The fact remains that the two religions, now coined together under common umbrella name ‘Hindu” were always and are distinct in practice, rituals, philosophy. The fact is that, although Vedics accepted idolatry gradually, they maintained their independent identity of religion with retaining all rights over Vedas, related literature and Vedic rites. To sum up, Shudra was never a part of Vedic society, but indeed was an independent religion theye are following from ancient times. To Vedics, like Dasa, Dasyus of Iran those followed different religions and hence looked upon contemptuously, similarly Shudras too became a derogatory term in Vedic literature to the adherents of different religion. The over-glorification of the Vedas and their divine origin, as we have seen in this chapter, has been a carefully nourished myth and deserves the rejection in totality. The harm it has done, in the form of seeding inferiority complex and sense of the inequality in the minds of non-Vedic masses, needs to be removed in the light of the bare facts!
Posted on: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 10:07:12 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015