Sigh...sometimes I can see Coopers perspective on things. But other times, when she makes statements that have no connection to logic or reality then I just cant. For instance on today 16th March 2014 she is going to say: In the case of Vybz Kartel, I speculate that nice and decent people in Jamaica have confidently presumed that the DJ is far from innocent. Proving guilt is an irrelevant obstruction of justice. That claim of hers makes no sense and is completely fanciful, when earlier on 13th March 2014 a group of ordinary citizens chosen as jurors, with Kartels consent via his legal representatives, considered the evidence in the case and found as a matter of fact that he is guilty. So Ms. Cooper, after the verdict there really can be no need to speculate on this - his guilt is fact. The only question in my mind, is why people like Cooper, who are so obsessed with painting Kartel as the victim of a conspiracy, never mention the three other ordinary yutes who were convicted along with him? Does this conspiracy to jail an innocent man only apply to Kartel? Does it only apply because he is a celebrity? Where are the articles and letters to the editor raising reasonable doubt? (as Cooper does here) in relation to the three other defendants? Do they not matter? How convenient.
Posted on: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 18:31:21 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015