So, Greg and i hypothesized that Malaysian flight 370 was hijacked well before it made the news... It makes more sense, given the type of passengers aboard the plane and the utility of the exercise, to take hostages than to crash the plane or use it in some other manner. However, given the new information about the one pilots political alliance with the PEACEFUL governmental candidate (recently imprisoned for sodomy), dont you think it makes more sense to point fingers at individuals affiliated with the OTHER candidate (the one that did the imprisoning)? This is a well-planned, tactical maneuver: 1) the flight simulator found in the pilots house wasnt discovered until several days AFTER the planes disappearance (planted?) 2) it would take lots of planning to execute a successfully-landed hijacking - is the time between the imprisonment of the peaceful candidate and the hijacking long enough for the pilot to have pulled it off in retaliation? 3) the pilot is conveniently affiliated with the recently imprisoned opponent - the investigation manifests distrust not only in that pilot and his family and friends, but also the political party with which hes aligned (How convenient.) 4) the government could have charged and imprisoned the peaceful candidate for sodomy at any time after said sodomy occurred (when ready to execute this plan?) 5) the Malaysian government, officials, and news have NOT been consistent with their answers about how the investigation is proceeding nor does it follow the most logical, tactical order (sloppy, poorly planned attempt to cover up?) What do you think? Stop pointing fingers at the pilot and start looking for individuals aligned with the current governmental regime?
Posted on: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 06:38:33 +0000