So I am ridiculed for questioning the validity of conventionally - TopicsExpress



          

So I am ridiculed for questioning the validity of conventionally accepted scientific facts that have conflicting evidence to suggest the contrary. Let me ask you all something. What does the scientific method suggest? Does it suggest that once we develop models of reality, we must assume that all other contradictory evidence is irrelevant and should be ignored? Or does it suggest that we consistently adapt our models of reality to conform to the empirical data available? Of course, we must also consider the source and the agenda behind the source.
Posted on: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 02:44:38 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015