So, a few things that just dont click with me regarding the Charlie Hebdo attack: 1. The attack was by all accounts a professional hit; they attacked during an editorial meeting, which demonstrates advanced reconnaissance and planning. The TWO assailants (Ive yet to see any video showing the third) appeared to be highly trained in combat techniques, yet neither have ever left France to fight in other countries, nor have they served in the French military. 2. In spite of all of the advanced planning and training, one of them manages to leave his ID in the car. 3. The video of the one suspect killing a wounded policeman in cold blood raises many serious questions. I have seen enough combat videos to know that one does not get hit with a 7.62 round without ones body showing obvious physical reaction, let alone the wound effects of a high velocity round. I will post a link to the video below, but it is graphic to the degree that it purportedly shows a man being murdered. I have no doubt that a horrible slaughter was committed yesterday, but it bothers me that there are so many conflicting areas regarding the chain of events. Warning, the video is GRAPHIC!
Posted on: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 17:52:43 +0000
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015