So, after reading the St. Croix Source this morning I came upon - TopicsExpress



          

So, after reading the St. Croix Source this morning I came upon this comment by Mr. Arturo Watlington that states: [The ballots Wednesday were fed into the systems new machines to be tabulated, and Watlington said that only 53 were rejected. The next step, he explained, would be to evaluate the rejected ballots and see if they could be duplicated by the board or not. “Those that are spoiled in certain categories could be remade, or they might be too spoiled to duplicate,” Watlington said. “Once we go through them, we would have to decide, but in order to scan them, they would have to be redone.”] So my question is: Isnt the whole purpose for scanning your own ballots so that you could determine what the next course of action will be to correct your ballot if there is an error or if it is rejected, so that your vote would count as you intended and not that your ballot would have to be duplicated or re-done? What are these BOE Members really doing? This is the kind of stuff that is making the people really question their motives. I say the people file a Class Action Lawsuit agains the BOE for Incompetence !!! Oh, we have thousands of ballots to count and can only do 50 at a time because the machine may overheat !!! SMH.
Posted on: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 14:39:26 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015