So heres a question for someone whos followed it more closely: IS there clear evidence that Michael Browns shooting was a criminal act? The jury didnt seem to think so; did they ignore some critical facts? Im approaching this from the POV of a jury member, who (if hes doing his job) doesnt go by gut feelings or circumstances, but compelling evidence thats actually available. I dont know if this cop was a Bad Guy, but I do know that sometimes Bad Guys get away, since our system (if its doing ITS job) has a significant burden of proof. Im perfectly willing to join the angry mob (metaphorical, not actual) if the jury did indeed let a bad cop off the hook. I just dont know.
Posted on: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 02:49:14 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015