So much to ask this historian. I like asking many historians who have different affiliations. Really see a difference in how they reference historical documentation to suit their views. Would like a non bias approach. Just state what happened and announce when your opinion comes in. Very hard for one to take something credible that is being presented with bias from the jump. I will always believe in what I believe to be the cause of much obvious but will respect the views of all. Yet historical facts or documents should be presented without bias, then commentary papers should be the place to keep opinions separate of the information, and then it is up to one to fit the information into their reasoning. Too much I read is so propaganda like.
Posted on: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:34:03 +0000