So this is where it is all up to at this moment in time......still nothing legible or understandable has come to me from this Whyalla Prosecution Unit Dear Sir, Please be advised that following your election to be prosecuted, the expiation notice has been withdrawn and the file forwarded for prosecution. This Branch no longer has conduct of the matter and your correspondence has been forwarded to the Whyalla Prosecution Unit for consideration. All further enquiries are best directed to the Whyalla Prosecution Unit on telephone 8648 8012. Regards Team Leader Correspondence Team Expiation Notice Branch South Australia Police Telephone: 08 8463 4388 Facsimile: 08 7322 3559 Email: [email protected] Website: police.sa.gov.au SOUTH AUSTRALIA POLICE KEEPING SA SAFE The information contained in this message and any attachment is confidential and may also be the subject of legal, professional privilege or public interest immunity. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this document and or its attachments is unauthorised. Please advise us by reply and then delete it from your system. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of SAPOL. From: howard munyard [mailto:howardmunyard@hotmail] Sent: Friday, 27 June 2014 8:10 AM To: SAPOL:Expiation Notice Branch; operator502@lawyerswithdepression Subject: Re: Hi, To Whom it may now concern, To Whom it may concern, At 12.47 AM I received by email a notice to appear marked urgent from what purported to be a court. The email address it came from is operator502@lawyerswithdepression Most unfairly, (if it was a legitimate notice) this email address cannot be replied to, so just in case it is legitimate I am sending a reply to you too. Please notify the relevant authority of my response which now follows. Thank you for your notice to appear. Unfortunately the attached file is in a format my computer does not recognise and will not open for me. Thus I cannot read the message. I presume there may be some change of date or something but not being able to know it I cannot consent to appear at an unknown location and at an unknown time for an unknown matter. You will need to send me this notice in a format that is readily opened by ordinary procedures and in reasonable time for me to act on it. I understand that proper procedure is important in matters of justice which I presume the court claims to operate in service of. As I am communicating in writing and we have a record of our communications this way, I point out that I recognise this court solely on the principle that it represents the ‘crown proper’ by that I mean that I will recognise the crown being representative of that entity known and defined as ‘Her majesty by the grace of God, Who the crown proper recognises as the Lord Jesus Christ. If this matter is being brought up or brought forward by any other ‘crown’ I do not recognise it’s authority and see it only as a corporation usurping true authority ultimately claiming it’s power from the Roman pontiff. This Roman pontiff I recognise as a historic and principally recognised enemy of the true and legitimate government. Thus, if the matter before the court is one which claims it’s legislative authority through the UCC /Uniform Commercial Code (as I suspect it is) I do not consent to any sort of contractual arrangement and I point out that a notice should have been sent to you from SA police informing of my fee of $250.00 per hour for detention of my person. Something I will presume to have happened from the moment of my person being caused to appear and function in response to this. The matter is seemingly therefore a contractual matter which carries no weight without my consent unless it is a ‘proper crown’ matter. In which case all jurisdiction will have to be subject to the Lord Jesus Christ ultimately and His principles strictly adhered to, particularly with regard to the handling of my person or property. I have a considerable amount of material to submit before this court and reasonable notice should be given me in order to prepare my case. I also point out that a fee of $43,000,000.00/forty three million dollars is placed on my life should I die in custody or be incapacitated in a manner similar to death for any period exceeding 48 hours. Damages for any injuries not fatal or equivalent thereto will be calculated and charged by me when they happen if they happen, those damages including damages to mental health and any of my property that suffers dereliction or other injury or loss in my absence. Any wrongful incarceration or illegitimate offences against my liberty will be charged in addition to the $250.00 per hour (which SA police have already consented to) at a rate equal to $1,000,000.00/one million dollars per year or division thereof. I am looking forward to your reply with a copy of the notice that is readily readable. Also, should the court find in it’s wisdom that it feels arresting of me is warranted, though I do not consent, I will deliver myself to the nearest police station without resistance but without consent so that there is no need of your officers or any employees or contractors to lay hands on me, which I will regard as actual assault and from that moment will be considered to have been taken into custody. I point out that I have committed no offence against any person, property or principle and I retain my common law rights of freedom of choice and movement with intention to charge a fee for every breach of those rights. There are sufficient precedents to inform the court that the crown it represents is liable for all the actions of it’s employees and or contractors. I will add more as seems good when I get to court. Sent from Windows Mail From: howard munyard Sent: Thursday, 12 December 2013 4:34 PM To: [email protected], howard munyard RE ; Expiation Notice #G0896875 A I am Howard Munyard, the person about whom this expiation notice exists. By today according to one of your notices, I was to have either paid an invoice/fine to you or else elect to be prosecuted. Given that stark choice (or else I might expect to have my personal sovereignty invaded by your departments employees) I am faced with electing to be prosecuted. My reasons have been previously stated. As I have been careful in my life to comply with good and orderly social requirements, I do not expect to be harassed now for the fact that I have been moderately incompetent under duress. In that, I have failed to get the paperwork back to your office by the appointed time. I will therefore deliver here up front what will be my written response, which is surely coming, being typed and saved in my computer, which I am not masterful at, which has all the devices downloaded to enable me to print it, but I can as yet not do it because payment is required and I/we cannot afford it. My wife being stranded interstate etc as you are free to read because I am presenting this part of my life on a public facebook page. You have now therefore no reason to concern yourself with trouble from me. I will deliver myself to the station. I cannot afford further travel, I am not paying the fine because I am electing to be prosecuted because you give me no choice. I am doing it this way because I am already determined to win this and if political imprisonment is part of winning I am here to present for it. Please understand that I do not want your officers dealing with me. They are known for taser use and using chemicals aggressively. I am a man in his fifties who has done no harm and your officers ‘normal’ activities should they encounter even reasonable and right resistance would certainly be life threatening to me. So, if in your inconsiderate continuance against my cause you should think to arrest me. Be notified hereby that that IS NOT NEEDED. Notify me by phone on 0402010100 do not leave a voice message I will not answer or hear it. Someone must speak to me or at least text me, which is a manner I prefer using as it records the attitudes and situations. I will IF YOU MUST deliver myself to my local police station and from there you may take me, in the presence of witnesses. Notice of intention to defend ; To Whom it may concern, I Howard Munyard acknowledge that this must have arrived late according to your laid out time table. Sorry, several things happened that effected my capacity to cope adequately with mailing and paper work, my wifes mother suddenly became terminally ill and she had to hitch a ride, yes hitch to western australia to be with her mum. Of course this was not helped by lack of funds and a certain amount of organisation ensured in order for her to catch her lift. She is now stranded there depending on financial help to return home. Consequent of all this I, living in a remote area and on a property with many normally shared duties, didnt attend to mail duties as I should. My wife normally does this. Anyway, in accordance with your instructions, I returned to the blue notice and followed the directions. Please notice that I ticked no box in relation to an offence, and this is the first part of my challenging the existence of an offence in the first place. I will be defending myself on the basis of being a free common man, one born free, native to this country, a free creature, not bound to acknowledge corporations such as are endeavoring to enforce an invoice on me now. I am not sure where or when to announce this so I will begin now by saying that any detention of my person or physical force applied to me will be met with a bill and legal action for compensation. Since I have no other guidelines, I will charge for the detainment of myself at $250.00 per hour, plus compensation and costs for any injuries, physical psychological or otherwise, for any loss of livestock during my absence from home, damage done to my power generation machinery sustained through neglect in my absence or any other reasonably foreseeable costs that may come upon me because of actions of detention effected against me by your departments or their officers, directly or indirectly so long as I can prove it. I understand that similar such cases have arisen before and that your side in this has pushed matters into higher courts knowing they could not be won. This I see as an unlawful use of taxpayer funds, where law officers/public servants knowingly make members of the public spend time and money and experience stress to defend themselves for having commited no unlawful conduct in a situation that everyone knows will finally prove futile. I am public on facebook and will be putting all details up publically. So, I state here that although only myself is facing this, thousands of Australians are concerned with the outcome. Particularly if law officers spend public funds pursuing a case that is not lawful and damage a member of the public in the process. I think it essential to announce these things now and will add such as is good at court. Yours H. Munyard 12/12/2013 ........................................................... Sent from Windows Mail
Posted on: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 01:39:58 +0000